Connect with Bon

WHINE Kindle US

Image of When Hope is Not Enough
When Hope is Not Enough
WHINE now available on the Kindle to US customers!

Buy WHINE Today!

Image of When Hope is Not Enough
When Hope is Not Enough
Get the Non-BPD book that is designed for
staying and working on the relationship

Poll

What do you do to support your emotional health?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

A free eBook – 4X4 for Nons

Here is a free eBook from Bon: Free eBook

Archives

Tough Love is NOT the Answer with BPD

I often peruse the web for articles and posts about dealing with people with Borderline Personality Disorder and what I usually find is incorrect and misguided. I recently stumbled upon a post that can be found here:

http://www.helium.com/tm/339437/individuals-suffering-borderline-personality

In which the author gives some insight and advice about “dealing with” someone with Borderline Personality Disorder. I’d like to look at her advice by excerpting some of her text and then offer a little commentary.

First of all, she says this:

Individuals suffering from borderline personality disorder are very self-destructive and they have great difficulty forming any good relationships. A deep-seeded fear of abandonment is behind every wayward action and prolonged mood swing. It’s [sic] victims are mainly women who show frequent displays of inappropriate anger and who exhibit forms of self-mutilation. They also act on impulse, without regards to consequences and than [sic] hold others responsible for their actions. They are sexually permissive and may indulge in binge eating and drug abuse. Victims of this disorder may shop lift. Hell bent on harming themselves, they live with no discipline or boundary.

While this characterization is generally true, it suffers from what wikipedia calls “weasel words”. Basically, the words that are used slant the information toward being extremely judgmental. What I mean is the use of the words “great difficulty forming any good relationships,” “every wayward action and prolonged mood swing,” “show frequent displays of inappropriate anger,” and “they live with no discipline or boundary” all show us that the author is judgmental toward the sufferer. The idea of “prolonged mood swing” is incorrect as well, since the “moods” of a person with BPD generally last only hours. Also, the idea that “they are sexually permissive” MAY be true for some of the sufferers, but not for all. The idea that a “fear of abandonment is behind EVERY wayward action” is also incorrect. Much of the “actions” are motivated by pain relief and/or shame. Use of the words “no discipline” betrays the authors true feelings about people with the disorder and tells me she doesn’t understand the disorder very well (see below on “Tough Love”).

Image of When Hope is Not Enough
When Hope is Not Enough
Get the Non-BPD book that is designed for
staying and working on the relationship

The author goes on to say:

Group therapy can resolve self-destructive behaviors. These individuals learn better from their peers because of their resistance to authority. Impulse behavior can be curtailed in this same setting.

Which is basically wrong. Group therapy does work (especially in the context of DBT), but not for the reasons that the author suggests. It is not a “resistance to authority” that drives the effectiveness of group therapy. Instead, seeing that one is not the only sufferer and having the ability to support one another normalizes the disorder. You are not just the broken, shameful person that you feel you are. Interestingly, many people with BPD will criticize others in the group and report that they are not as “crazy” as those people are.

The thing I have the most problem with is this:

Tough love may be needed from family members and loved ones before the person asks for assistance.

This statement is completely false and possibly harmful. Here is the text of a post of mine in the ATSTP group which addresses Tough Love:

Depending on the actual problem with your son(s) the idea of “tough love” might be the worst thing for him (them). While it seems to work for substance abuse, tough love can be an awful mixture for those with ERD-like issues. The problem comes down to the “invalidating environment” as Marsha Linehan puts it. Tough love will invalidate a person’s basic feelings and lead to shame and the feeling of “brokenness”. I have seen this first-hand with one of my daughter’s friends. This friend is 16 now and is a classic BPD/ERD case. She has been kicked out of several “lock down” facilities. Recently her mother sent her to a “tough love”/boot camp. It was a total disaster for the kid and for the family.

A better approach IMO, is emotional validation + a sense of personal responsibility. This combination is built through letting the person know that feelings are not wrong or right, they just ARE. The second half comes through building mastery over their behavior associated with feelings. Bad feelings just exist. This is important because often a person with such issues will use behaviors (like drug abuse or cutting or raging) to make the bad feelings go away as quickly as possible. They need to learn to tolerate the distress and behave in an effective manner. Once this new behavior/reaction to feelings is practiced, they can eventually build mastery over the behaviors. This works backward to help quell the feelings.

It seems that most parents believe that emotional validation = “giving in” (or agreeing with the child or “poor discipline” or whatever). This is NOT the case. It’s difficult for me to express this more firmly. Remember the word “emotional” is important. If you validate invalid behavior, you are enabling. It is important to separate in your mind the emotions (which are natural) from the behavior (which can be painful to all involved). If that separation can be communicated to the person with ERD, it can be worked with. It is difficult, but possible.

Unfortunately, tough love is not the answer.

Genetics and BPD

In this study, researchers posit that traits associated with BPD are inherited (impulsivity and emotional regulation). Here is a quote from the abstract:

The effect of genes on the development of BPD is likely substantial. The effect of common family environment may be close to zero.

While the study doesn’t conclude that BPD is 100% inherited, it does point to certain genetic factors in the BPD adaptive behaviors (or maladaptive).

The main point of posting this is to chip away at the myth that BPD and other personality disorders are all the “fault” of parenting or abusive environments. One of the big problems that I have seen in the social, psychological and medical community is that when a child is identified as borderline, the parents immediately come under suspicion as being abusive or neglectful. This can cause more consternation and confusion on the part of the parents who are already dealing with a serious mental illness and the issues that come with it.

There is a common myth concerning BPD. That myth is that BPD is completely and only caused by abusive environments. Invalidating environments can be a contributing cause – but these invalidating environments do not have to be abusive. If a certain child is emotionally unstable, sometimes the parents’ reaction is “cut it out” or “get over it”. The problem with this approach is that the child feels how they feel regardless of their adpative abilities (or lack thereof). In other words, the child may feel scared or angry even if there is no external reason to feel that way. These feelings (or the inability to control them) CAN be genetic – it might be that that is just the way that they ARE.

That being said, BPD is not a sure thing or a life sentence. The sufferer can learn skills to adpat to their emotional states. Their families can also learn these skills and, if they do, they can stop contributing (even unknowingly) to the borderlines problems.

It is saddening that personality disorders (particularly Borderline and Schizotypal) are classified as Axis II disorders when other disorders (like Bipolar and Schizophernia) are Axis I. Why does it matter? It matters because of access to mental health care is restricted due to insurance coverage limitations.

Hypersensitivty to Sensory Stimulation

I recently saw a thread in which borderlines were discussing their “hypersensitivity” to certain sensory stimulation.

If you know my story, you know that one of my daughters has dysfunctional emotional reactions. I like to think of that as pre-BPD. I hope that the actual onset of full BPD can be avoided. One of the things that has started happening with her more and more is she has developed a sensitivity to certain foods. She can’t eat certain foods and she finds certain smells offensive. The other day she found the milk smelled sour, even when it was not sour for everyone else in the family. I think this hypersensitivity thing has some merit.

Adopted Children and BPD

This is a link to site positing that adopted children are often mis-diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Sometimes, BPD is characterized by an “”inability to connect”" with parents. In the case of adopted persons, the initial invalidation of being “”rejected”" by one’s birth parents can be a life-long struggle. I have found that in Family Support groups close to 40% of the children diagnosed with BPD were adopted. However, there is another theory that has been overlooked by this author. That is that the birth parents of these children may have exposed them to biological impulsivity. If the mothers of the adopted children are impulsive – having sex and getting pregnant when it is not possible to keep a child – is it likely that the impulsivity has been passed down to the child? Meaning, the parents (who may have BPD tendencies, since they are often young and impulsive and engaging in unsafe behaviors themselves) may biologically pre-dispose those children to emotional dysregulation and BPD. It is impossible to know whether these children would develop BPD if they had stayed with their birth parents, but, going back to the biosocial model, they may have biological factors from their parents that are furthered by the initial rejection. This is just a theory and not based on scientific evidence at all. I would agree that, given my experience with families of diagnosed borderlines, a large portion of the children are adopted. Certainly, more study is needed. I would just suggest that perhaps the unsafe and impulsive behaviors of their birth parents might also play a role in their development of emotional dysregulation. It is not necessarily all the “”inability to connect”" with the adopted parents.http://borderlinebyproxy.blogspot.com/2006/04/bpd-adopted-important.html

BPD: Emotional Dysregulation and MRI/fMRI

A study, using an MRI, of BPD patients found:

We believe that this hyper excitability in BPD patients, particularly in brain regions thought to be involved in generating emotions, is likely to put this patient group at high risk for experiencing episodes of abnormally intense and inappropriate negative emotions characteristic of ED. In support of our hypothesis, we also found that the level of amygdala activation to the Fearful, and Neutral faces in BPD patients is significantly correlated with diagnostic measures of emotional lability.

So, what does this mean? If you “go calm” or “neutral” on the BP in your life, they will not understand it – their brain sees “neutral” as threatening.