“SUICIDAL BEHAVIOR IS A BROAD term that includes death bysuicide and intentional, nonfatal, self-injurious acts committed with or without intent to die. It is associated with severalmental disorders, including depression, substance dependence, and schizophrenia. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is 1 of only 2 DSM-IV diagnoses for which suicidal behavior is a criterion.“

The emphasis is mine. I thought “what’s the other disorder that suicidal behavior is a criterion?” The answer: Major Depressive Disorder. So, today I am posting the DSM criteria for Major Depressive Disorder. It’s fairly long and I’ve included the “Major Depressive Episode” to clarify. If you’d like to get the full criteria, follow the “continue reading” link.

Major Depressive Episode

A. Five (or more) of the following symptoms have been present during the same 2-week period and represent a change from previous functioning; at least one of the symptoms is either (1) depressed mood or (2) loss of interest or pleasure.

Note: Do note include symptoms that are clearly due to a general medical condition, or mood-incongruent delusions or hallucinations.

(1) depressed mood most of the day, nearly every day, as indicated by either subjective report (e.g., feels sad or empty) or observation made by others (e.g., appears tearful). Note: In children and adolescents, can be irritable mood.

(2) markedly diminished interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities most of the day, nearly every day (as indicated by either subjective account or observation made by others)

(3) significant weight loss when not dieting or weight gain (e.g., a change of more than 5% of body weight in a month), or decrease or increase in appetite nearly every day. Note: In children, consider failure to make expected weight gains.

(4) insomnia or hypersomnia nearly every day

(5) psychomotor agitation or retardation nearly every day (observable by others, not merely subjective feelings of restlessness or being slowed down)

(6) fatigue or loss of energy nearly every day

(7) feelings of worthlessness or excessive or inappropriate guilt (which may be delusional) nearly every day (not merely self-reproach or guilt about being sick)

(8) diminished ability to think or concentrate, or indecisiveness, nearly every day (either by subjective account or as observed by others)

(9) recurrent thoughts of death (not just fear of dying), recurrent suicidal ideation without a specific plan, or a suicide attempt or a specific plan for committing suicide

B. The symptoms do not meet criteria for a Mixed Episode.

C. The symptoms cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

D. The symptoms are not due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, a medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., hypothyroidism).

E. The symptoms are not better accounted for by Bereavement, i.e., after the loss of a loved one, the symptoms persist for longer than 2 months or are characterized by marked functional impairment, morbid preoccupation with worthlessness, suicidal ideation, psychotic symptoms, or psychomotor retardation.

Major Depressive Disorder

Single Episode

A. Presence of a single Major Depressive Episode

B. The Major Depressive Episode is not better accounted for by Schizoaffective Disorder and is not superimposed on Schizophrenia, Schizophreniform Disorder, Delusional Disorder, or Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified.

C. There has never been a Manic Episode, a Mixed Episode, or a Hypomanic Episode. Note: This exclusion does not apply if all the manic-like, mixed-like, or hypomanic-like episodes are substance or treatment induced or are due to the direct physiological effects of a general medical condition.

Recurrent

A. Presence of two or more Major Depressive Episodes.

Note: To be considered separate episodes, there must be an interval of at least 2 consecutive months in which criteria are not met for a Major Depressive Episode.

B. The Major Depressive Episodes are not better accounted for by Schizoaffective Disorder and are not superimposed on Schizophrenia, Schizophreniform Disorder, Delusional Disorder, or Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified.

C. There has never been a Manic Episode, a Mixed Episode, or a Hypomanic Episode. Note: This exclusion does not apply if all the manic-like, mixed-like, or hypomanic-like episodes are substance or treatment induced or are due to the direct physiological effects or a general medical condition.

Specify (for current or most recent episode):
Severity/Psychotic/Remission Specifiers
Chronic
With Catatonic Features
With Atypical Features
With Postpartum Onset

Specify
Longitudinal Course Specifiers (With and Without Interepisode Recovery)
With Seasonal Pattern

Major Depressive Disorder

Single Episode

A. Presence of a single Major Depressive Episode

B. The Major Depressive Episode is not better accounted for by Schizoaffective Disorder and is not superimposed on Schizophrenia, Schizophreniform Disorder, Delusional Disorder, or Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified.

C. There has never been a Manic Episode, a Mixed Episode, or a Hypomanic Episode. Note: This exclusion does not apply if all the manic-like, mixed-like, or hypomanic-like episodes are substance or treatment induced or are due to the direct physiological effects of a general medical condition.

Recurrent

A. Presence of two or more Major Depressive Episodes.

Note: To be considered separate episodes, there must be an interval of at least 2 consecutive months in which criteria are not met for a Major Depressive Episode.

B. The Major Depressive Episodes are not better accounted for by Schizoaffective Disorder and are not superimposed on Schizophrenia, Schizophreniform Disorder, Delusional Disorder, or Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified.

C. There has never been a Manic Episode, a Mixed Episode, or a Hypomanic Episode. Note: This exclusion does not apply if all the manic-like, mixed-like, or hypomanic-like episodes are substance or treatment induced or are due to the direct physiological effects or a general medical condition.

Specify (for current or most recent episode):
Severity/Psychotic/Remission Specifiers
Chronic
With Catatonic Features
With Atypical Features
With Postpartum Onset

Specify
Longitudinal Course Specifiers (With and Without Interepisode Recovery)
With Seasonal Pattern

Related posts:

1. A Classic Case of BPD
2. BPD: What’s the Cost?
3. Understanding Major Depression With Borderline Personality Disorder?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Bon: I found an interview with Dr. Leland Heller about Borderline Personality Disorder. He does a good job explaining the pain associated with the disorder… Here are some excerpts. The entire interview can be read here.

Diagnosing Borderline Personality Disorder And Finding Treatment That Works

Dr Heller: Good evening, It’s great to be here. I have a way of explaining the Borderline Personality Disorder in layman’s terms that might be useful. It’s how I explain it to patients and their families.

Imagine you had a pet dog and it runs into the street and by accident it’s hit by a car. The dog’s leg is broken and it limps off into an alley to lick it’s wounds. A friend of yours sees the dog and comes over to help. The dog is now feeling trapped and cornered – a “wounded animal” – and misinterprets the friend’s attempts to help. The dog snaps at the friend’s hand who is trying to help. The BPD (Borderline Personality Disorder) is a malfunction in the brain’s trapped or “cornered” animal area. Under stress, a seizure develops in that area. That’s why under stress, while raging, a borderline will say to him or herself: “Why am I doing this” – yet be unable to stop it. It’s a seizure – nerve cells firing inappropriately and out of control.

David: And the cause of Borderline Personality Disorder?

Dr Heller: The BPD has many causes including head trauma and brain infections, but it appears that emotional hurts literally damage the brain. Most likely the brain’s support cells – the 90% of brain cells called “glial cells” – are damaged by traumas, causing the person to overreact to stress once puberty strikes. During puberty the brain’s limbic system goes into “overdrive” and adolescents are at their highest risk of seizures in their lifetime. “Sticks and stones may break my bones…but names cause brain damage.” So does incest, abuse, severe trauma, head injuries, attention deficit disorder, and other causes.

David: From my understanding, one of the biggest difficulties facing individuals who have BPD is maintaining stable relationships. This is a great cause of consternation for those people who are on the other side of the relationship. What causes this?

Dr Heller: There are a number of problems. The three most significant are 1) inappropriate mood swings; 2) misinterpretation of motives; and 3) remembering those misinterpreted motives as real. Oftentimes self-fulfilling prophecies occur, and self-hate eventually leads to a significant other coming to the same conclusion – that the individual isn’t worth being with.
…
janet: Would you please tell us more about the self-hate characteristic and how that damages the BPD or his/her relationships?

Dr Heller: Much of it comes from self-destructive behaviors that are used to stop the horrible pain of dysphoria; anxiety, rage, depression and despair. When an individual behaves out-of-control, in a manner that’s inconsistent with their beliefs or normal choices, terrible self-hate develops. Additionally many individuals had low self-esteem and related problems since childhood and are in an environment that causes self-hate to flourish.

crazy32810: How is self-injury related to BPD?

Dr Heller: We all injure ourselves to stop noxious neurological sensations. Interestingly we do it in a linear manner, ripping the skin. A common noxious neurological sensation is the toxins released with an insect bite. BPD dysphoria is about as bad as it gets. The pain is horrible. Many individuals have broken major bones and declared the pain of the fracture was nowhere as severe as dysphoria. When an individual with the BPD discovers that self-mutilation, or other techniques of self injury, work to temporarily stop the pain of dysphoria – they’ll do what it takes to stop it. This is no different than the individual with a fracture wants pain medication. I broke my shoulder last December and I tried to deal with it without taking narcotics. I was foolish and wrong. The pain was so bad it needed to be treated medically. Once individuals with the BPD have their chronic symptoms stabilized, and have safe medication options that work for dysphoria, the self-destructive patterns are no longer needed to stop their pain.

Related posts:

1. Interesting Article from Time Magazine on BPD
2. Tough Love is not an effective approach to BPD
3. A Must-Read Interview with a recovered Borderline

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

TRAGIC AMY WINEHOUSE HAD ‘MENTAL ILLNESS’

TROUBLED Amy Winehouse suffered from an undiagnosed mental illness, a relative has revealed.

The talented soul singer could have been struck down by the little-known Borderline Personality Disorder.

Sufferers have feelings of anger, emptiness, shame and guilt and become emotionally volatile.

And it can also push them into substance abuse and eating disorders, both of which Amy succumbed to.

Yesterday a member of the Back To Black star’s family said: “It was never diagnosed, because unfortunately she would never agree to a proper diagnosis.

“I’m not an expert, but from what I’ve read on Borderline Personality Disorder it kind of fitted with her.”

Meanwhile Amy’s dad Mitch, 61, said he wished his daughter, who died in July aged 27, had sought counselling.

He said: “She never stopped trying.

“She hated the way she was when she was drunk and when she was ill.

“And you know, the way I look at it, she died trying.

“She didn’t give up. She died trying to make her- self better.”

This article, although short, points out several interesting things about people with BPD. Since there’s no guarantee she had it, I’m going to generalize a bit. First of all, it is tragic that BPD is “little known” because it is much more prevalent than bipolar disorder. The article says: “Sufferers have feelings of anger, emptiness, shame and guilt and become emotionally volatile. And it can also push them into substance abuse and eating disorders, both of which Amy succumbed to.” This is very true. A person in extreme emotional pain will do anything to stop the pain. The article ends with “She died trying to make her- self better.” I’d like to amend that statement to “She died trying to make feel her-self better.” That’s the nature of the disorder and that’s what many non-BPDs do not understand. It’s all about his/her feelings (IAAHF) and not about controlling, manipulating or calling for attention.

See larger image Lioness: Hidden Treasures (Audio CD) List Price: $13.98 USD New From: $9.27 In Stock Used from: $7.99 In Stock Release date December 6, 2011.

Related posts:

1. The Borderline Child
2. Amy Winehouse, addiction and BPD from the NY Times
3. Amy Winehouse found dead at 27

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

F60.3 Emotionally Unstable (Borderline) Personality Disorder

A personality disorder in which there is a marked tendency to act impulsively without consideration of the consequences, together with affective instability. The ability to plan ahead may be minimal, and outbursts of intense anger may often lead to violence or “behavioural explosions”; these are easily precipitated when impulsive acts are criticized or thwarted by others. Two variants of this personality disorder are specified, and both share this general theme of impulsiveness and lack of self-control.

Impulsive type:
The predominant characteristics are emotional instability and lack of impulse control. Outbursts of violence or threatening behaviour are common, particularly in response to criticism by others.

Includes:

• explosive and aggressive personality (disorder)

Excludes:

• dissocial personality disorder

Borderline type:
Several of the characteristics of emotional instability are present; in addition, the patient’s own self-image, aims, and internal preferences (including sexual) are often unclear or disturbed. There are usually chronic feelings of emptiness. A liability to become involved in intense and unstable relationships may cause repeated emotional crises and may be associated with excessive efforts to avoid abandonment and a series of suicidal threats or acts of self-harm (although these may occur without obvious precipitants).

Includes:

• borderline personality (disorder)

Related posts:

1. DSM-IV Criteria
2. Proposed Changes in the DSM-V for Borderline Personality Disorder
3. A Must-Read Interview with a recovered Borderline

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose borderline personality disorder, the following criteria must be met:

A.   Significant impairments in personality functioning manifest by:

1.  Impairments in self functioning (a or b):

a.   Identity: Markedly impoverished, poorly developed, or unstable self-image, often associated with excessive self-criticism; chronic feelings of emptiness; dissociative states under stress.

b.   Self-direction: Instability in goals, aspirations, values, or career plans.

AND

2.   Impairments in interpersonal functioning (a or b):

a.   Empathy: Compromised ability to recognize the feelings and needs of others associated with interpersonal hypersensitivity (i.e., prone to feel slighted or insulted); perceptions of others selectively biased toward negative attributes or vulnerabilities.

b.   Intimacy: Intense, unstable, and conflicted close relationships, marked by mistrust, neediness, and anxious preoccupation with real or imagined abandonment; close relationships often viewed in extremes of idealization and devaluation and alternating between over involvement and withdrawal.

B.  Pathological personality traits in the following domains:

1.   Negative Affectivity, characterized by:

a.   Emotional lability: Unstable emotional experiences and frequent mood changes; emotions that are easily aroused, intense, and/or out of proportion to events and circumstances.

b.   Anxiousness: Intense feelings of nervousness, tenseness, or panic, often in reaction to interpersonal stresses; worry about the negative effects of past unpleasant experiences and future negative possibilities; feeling fearful, apprehensive, or threatened by uncertainty; fears of falling apart or losing control.

c.   Separation insecurity: Fears of rejection by – and/or separation from – significant others, associated with fears of excessive dependency and complete loss of autonomy.

d.   Depressivity: Frequent feelings of being down, miserable, and/or hopeless; difficulty recovering from such moods; pessimism about the future; pervasive shame; feeling of inferior self-worth; thoughts of suicide and suicidal behavior.

2.   Disinhibition, characterized by:

a.   Impulsivity: Acting on the spur of the moment in response to immediate stimuli; acting on a momentary basis without a plan or consideration of outcomes; difficulty establishing or following plans; a sense of urgency and self-harming behavior under emotional distress.

b.   Risk taking: Engagement in dangerous, risky, and potentially self-damaging activities, unnecessarily and without regard to consequences; lack of concern for one’s limitations and denial of the reality of personal danger.

3. Antagonism, characterized by:

a.   Hostility: Persistent or frequent angry feelings; anger or irritability in response to minor slights and insults.

C.  The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and consistent across situations.

D.  The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are not better understood as normative for the individual’s developmental stage or socio-cultural environment.

E.  The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma).

Related posts:

1. A New Name for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)?
2. BPD Myth Busting: 7 common myths about Borderline Personality Disorder
3. A primer on Emotional Dysregulation and its role in Borderline Personality Disorder

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Two of the potential issues Anthony could suffer from are border personality disorder and psychopathology, the experts said. The main thing these issues have in common is a total lack of empathy, according to LeslieBeth Wish, a psychologist and licensed social worker in Sarasota, Fla.

“They can turn a person into a non-person,” Wish said. “Borderline personalities have more emotional regulation problem and often use lying to get away from something and not ever feeling like they’re responsible.”

Those two potential issues were the ones that I identified and opined on the other day. The second paragraph above is why I believe that Casey Anthony probably doesn’t have BPD. The reasons for the lies are not impulsive and reactive, as they seem to be most often in BPD. People with BPD are much more likely to “bullshit” (as a term of art not vulgarity) than to actually lie with proactive intent. They can make up some elaborate stories about themselves, typically to make their world a safer and more livable place when others think better of them. Still, most often BPD lies are to get through a painful moment. Very often as the lies collapse, they will admit everything and ask forgiveness. Casey did NOT do this. She maintained her lies even after the police were aware they were lies. In fact, she started lying to her parents LONG BEFORE Caylee went missing.  She lied (by omission) about her pregnancy. She lied about having a job at Universal Studios BEFORE the cops got involved.

As for psychopathy…. I presented the guidelines of Hare’s PCL-R on the other page. Let’s look at them again and see which of these seem to match Casey Anthony, based on what we know from the press:

PCL-R items

The following findings are for research purposes only, and are not used in clinical diagnosis. These items cover the affective, interpersonal, and behavioral features. Each item is rated on a score from zero to two. The sum total determines the extent of a person’s psychopathy.

Factor 1

Aggressive narcissism – Hard to say for Casey Anthony. We don’t really know enough. We do know that, when in jail, she got angry about what this situation was doing to HER!

Glibness/superficial charm – Yes.

Grandiose sense of self-worth – Again hard to say. This is one factor that really separates BPD from the narcissism spectrum. People with BPD have a lot of shame and generally hate themselves.

Pathological lying – YES, YES, YES.

Cunning/manipulative – I’d have to say yes.

Lack of remorse or guilt – Again, I think we need to say yes here.

Emotionally shallow – Hard to say.

Callous/lack of empathy – Could be. Hard to say.

Failure to accept responsibility for own actions – Yes. It’s never her fault.

Factor 2

Socially deviant lifestyle – Party girl. One night stands.

Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom – Probably, but who knows.

Parasitic lifestyle – Yes. She was living off her parents and then off friends while pretending to have a job. Actually, it is interesting to note that she was telling her mother she had a job long before Caylee disappeared.

Poor behavioral control – Probably. Again, one night stands.

Promiscuous sexual behavior – Yes.

Lack of realistic, long-term goals – Yes.

Impulsiveness – Yes.

Irresponsibility – Yes.

Juvenile delinquency – well, some form of delinquency. She stole checks from her friend and passed them.

Early behavioral problems – unknown.

Revocation of conditional release – we’ll see.

Traits not correlated with either factor

Many short-term marital relationships – no, but many short-term boyfriends

Criminal versatility – it depends. She stole and possibly caused the death of her daughter. They couldn’t prove it in court to the satisfaction of the jury, but we may never know.

Ok, onto the article:

‘Dr. Judy’ Doubts Casey Anthony’s Penchant for Lying Can Be Cured

By CHRISTINA NG
July 19, 2011

Casey Anthony’s lawyers have said that Anthony has suffered “trauma” and will need counseling now that she is a free woman, but experts aren’t sure Anthony can be helped.

“It would be exceptionally difficult for anybody to treat her. There is no magic pill that’s a truth serum for a person who’s a pathological liar,” said Dr. Judy Kuriansky a psychologist from Columbia University, but better known from her radio show as Dr. Judy.

Kuriansky believes that Anthony likely feels that she has been rewarded for her lying with her acquittal and release from jail.

“Why would she want to go to therapy when she basically got what she wanted? There’s no motivation for her to seek help,” Kuriansky said. “If she had been sent to jail, maybe she would want to see somebody because her style didn’t work, but it did.”

Anthony, 25, is in hiding after being released from a Florida jail following her acquittal on murder charges for the death of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee. She has received death threats and as she left jail protesters changed “Caylee, Caylee.”

Casey Anthony Therapy Will Be ‘Challenge’

Anthony’s criminal lawyer Jose Baez has said, “It is my hope that Casey Anthony can receive the counselling and treatment she needs to move forward with the rest of her life.”

Her civil attorney Charles Greene was quoted as saying Anthony was “emotionally unstable” following the trauma of her daughter’s death and the grueling trial.

Psychologists interviewed by ABCNews.com agree that the desire to change is the key to successful treatment for pathological liars, which some believe Anthony may be.

While acquitted of murder, she was convicted on four counts of lying to police. One of her lies was that Caylee was kidnapped by a fictional nanny named Zanny. Zanny was one of a dozen bogus characters that Casey had created. She also lied about working at Universal Studios.

None of the psychologists who spoke with ABCNews.com have treated Casey Anthony, but spoke from observations and personal experience.

Two of the potential issues Anthony could suffer from are border personality disorder and psychopathology, the experts said. The main thing these issues have in common is a total lack of empathy, according to LeslieBeth Wish, a psychologist and licensed social worker in Sarasota, Fla.

“They can turn a person into a non-person,” Wish said. “Borderline personalities have more emotional regulation problem and often use lying to get away from something and not ever feeling like they’re responsible.”

Wish explains that for people who suffer from these problems, separate lies can quickly become entire narratives that the teller can even come to believe as true.

“A lie begets a lie and it’s easy to get trapped in telling lies to protect other lies,” Wish said. “Does she believe her lies? She might, but more than likely she believes that she’s good enough to make you believe her lies.”

While Kuriansky emphasizes that she cannot make a diagnosis on a patient she has not seen, she does believe that Anthony has a personality disorder. Her personality disorder could have “narcissistic features with particular attention to pathological lying.”

The symptoms of this problem include volatile moods, extremely manipulative personalities, a lack of empathy of others and a strongly defensive nature, she said.

“I believe there is something that can be done for people like this,” said Tony Ferretti, a psychologist in Melbourne, Fla. “The behavior has been learned and can be unlearned. A person is not born a liar.”

The problem with Anthony, Ferretti believes, is that she does not appear to have the motivation or desire to change her behavior.

“It’s kind of like an addict, until they acknowledge that they have a problem or desire or motivation to change, nothing is going to chnge,” Ferretti said.

Casey Anthony Therapy Will Be ‘Formidable Challenge’ to a Therapist

Wish said the problem generally develops in early childhood and can come from a lack nurturing and stability, especially from parents.

Casey Anthony’s murder trial tore apart the Anthony family with lurid accusations that her father and brother molested her and that her father had a mistress. George Anthony denied those accusations. Casey Anthony’s relationship with her mother was also portrayed as strained, with several witnesses saying that the two argued a lot and were often at odds.

Psychologists agree that all of this could contribute to Casey Anthony’s penchant for lying.

Kuriansky believes that Anthony might be able to benefit from supportive counseling, but this would be a formidable challenge for a counselor or therapist who would need to be on guard about believing anything Anthony said.

“It’s really hard to treat,” Wish said. “You can’t say it’s impossible, but it’s very difficult.”

“These are people that cannot withstand very much self-examination, but you can work on emotional regulation and helping them understand and see [things] differently,” Wish said. “It’s a very small rope of balancing emotions and thinking.”

All three psychologists agree that it mainly comes down to what the person in question wants. If they want help, they can be successful, but if they do not, it is virtually impossible to help them.

Casey Anthony is a free woman and her next step is up to her, and perhaps her lawyers, but Wish believes, “She still needs something. She can’t just be tossed out there.”

Related posts:

1. Amy Winehouse is back in the news again
2. ABC News Reports: Ignored Psych Patient Dies on Hospital Floor
3. Experts Argue that BPD should be an Axis I disorder

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

latimes.com

BOOSTER SHOTS: Oddities, musings and news from the health world

Personality disorders category is likely to be dramatically revised for next psychiatry textbook

By Shari Roan, Los Angeles Times / For the Booster Shots blog

12:05 PM PDT, July 7, 2011

Several types of personality disorders will be dropped from the next edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. But one disorder previously proposed for elimination — narcissistic personality disorder — will likely remain in the text.

The American Psychiatric Assn. announced Thursday that the framework for personality disorders in DSM-5 will be a “hybrid” model that is substantially different from how personality disorders are diagnosed currently. Under the new system, personality disorders will be aligned with particular personality traits and levels of impairment.

The committee working on the personality disorders chapter of the DSM-5, which is due to be published in 2013, has proposed six types of disorders: antisocial, avoidant, borderline, narcissistic, obsessive/compulsive and schizotypal. They have proposed dropping paranoid, histrionic, schizoid and dependent personality disorders.

However, to qualify for a diagnosis, a patient would have to have a high level of impairment in two areas of personality functioning — self and interpersonal. Patients would be assessed for how they view themselves and how they pursue their goals in life, for example, as well as how they get along with other people and whether they think about the consequences of their actions. The new model is less rigid than the existing diagnostic model. It is designed to reflect that behavior can change over time while personality traits tend to remain stable.

“In the past, we viewed personality disorders as binary. You either had one or you didn’t,” said Dr. Andrew Skodol, chairman of the DSM work group on personality disorders, in a news release. “But now we understand that personality pathology is a matter of degree.”

The American Psychiatric Assn. also announced that a public comment period on DSM-5 proposals has been extended through July 15.

 

Related posts:

1. A New Name for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)?
2. It’s time to reject the notion that people with personality disorders are beyond help
3. Proposed Changes in the DSM-V for Borderline Personality Disorder

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Coming out of the Borderline Personality Disorder Closet (Without Hitting my Head on the Door Jamb)

By SONIA NEALE

Six years ago I was officially diagnosed by a psychiatrist in a psychiatric hospital as having…drum roll please…BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER.  He said it to me in the same way he would announce he had a plague of rats infest his kitchen, discovered I had a sexually transmitted disease or that he had just found out I supported Tea Party candidate Sarah Palin.  It was delivered with revulsion, disgust and contempt.

Today I proudly come out of the BPD closet and out myself as having one of the most reviled and hated personality disorders ever constructed by the most esteemed and eminent fundamentalist gentlemen writers of the Psychiatric Bible the DSM – Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.

If mental illness is stigmatised and discriminated against within the general community, then Borderline Personality Disorder is stigmatized and discriminated against within the mental health industry.

I was diagnosed as a BPD by a psychiatrist who had spent less than an hour talking with me around about the same time my clinical psychologist (of eight years at the time back in 2005) told me I was a schizoid personality disorder.  These two personality disorders are diametrically opposed.  One is excessive emotion (think Roseanne) and the other is no emotion at all (think Sheldon Cooper – Big Bang Theory).
I have had four psychiatric hospital stays over 15 years, the first when I was on Zoloft and had three children under five with post natal depression.  The second was after dexamphetamine withdrawal; the third after a kidney cancer diagnosis and subsequent overdose of valium; and the last suffering with the excruciating side effects of akathisia from Zyprexa.

After the last visit, I decided pills were part of the problem, so I decided psychotropic medication was no longer an option for me.  Previous to my diagnosis I researched BPD and discovered that I did fit somewhat into the nine symptoms, which include emotional dysregulation, abandonment issues, relationship problems, impulsive behaviour, suicide ideation, splitting into black and white, identity disturbance, emptiness and paranoia.  But my clinical psychologist admitted she too suffered from much of the above at some point in her life but to a lesser degree, one which does not cause psychiatric issues in her life.

I took each and every sign and symptom and made major changes in my life.  It took several years to do so.  I would monitor my behaviour, thoughts and feelings with mindfulness, reflection, education and blogging.  In the over two years I have been blogging on Psych Central I have had ants crawling up my spine at the thought of putting on the internet that I have been officially diagnosed with BPD.
Only now I find it empowering to speak out and share my story.

The pre-existing condition to being diagnosed with BPD which is not in the revered and almighty DSM is to be a woman and to have an outspoken opinion.  But I was not born with BPD; I was born with a genetic predisposition towards sensitivity.  It was this sensitivity which led to heightened emotional feelings, deep insight at an early age, bullying and sexual assault by a group of girls at school, parental invalidation of who I was and how I felt, being sexually provocative and active at an early age and fighting endlessly with authority.  An inability to process the world around me led to eating disorders, relationship problems, smoking, drinking and recreational drug issues.

My relationship with my adored clinical psychologist over many years changed my brain.  I have often been criticized and ridiculed by readers of my blog because of my long-term relationship with the woman I credit with saving my marriage, my family and my life but without her love and kindness where would I be now?

Long-term psychotherapy was non-evasive brain surgery for me, eliminating those parts which caused me distress.  I didn’t need just CBT and interpersonal therapy, I needed a loving mother who would nurture and support me and raise me as her own.

It was this relationship that led me to my true calling.  I now work as a peer worker in the mental health industry.  I recently had to give a presentation speech to a bunch of dry, prune-faced, bored, disinterested, clinical-depression-grey haired, jaded and tired psychiatrists, doctors and professional people and I said:

“You are the first people to know this as it has been my secret for six years, but I was diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder which is the most reviled diagnosis in the DSM – so you can all throw rotten tomatoes at me now if you like.”

Not one of them batted a stony eyelid, let alone threw a red, soggy, decomposed vegetable in my eye.  Not one of them moved a finger, smiled, nodded, hmmmed, assented, moved or laughed or in any way acknowledged the sheer immensity of what I had just spoken about.

My job is to reveal carefully honed, but intimate details about my life in a safe manner to me, and my job is to connect with consumers/professionals due to my lived experience.  It was like trying to mash a banana through a brick wall.  I did not engage or connect with any of them in that vacuum of silence and disinterest.  I have never had that in all my radio work, public speaking engagements or anything.  I have been told that when I speak I am very seductive (in the entertaining and compelling sense) and I could not seduce them in any way, shape or form.  Even taking account that it was 3pm on a Friday afternoon, they were simply unseduceable.

It reminded me of the anti-climax in the movie “The Truman Show” when Jim Carrey discovers no-one really cares about his life.  Nobody actually cared about my revelation.  But I am so glad I did it, I realise that coming out of the borderline closet will be of major importance, not just to me, but to other BPD diagnosed people, who live under the radioactive umbrella of shame, guilt, embarrassment, self-loathing and who are too afraid to come out of the closet in case they bang their heads on the door-jamb on the way out.

Sonia Neale started therapy writing for post-natal-depression and anxiety. Fifteen years later she is the author of two books, The Bad Mother’s Revenge and Death by Teenager, both published by ABC Books/Harper Collins. She lives in Western Australia, is married with three teenagers, has a certificate in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy and is studying for a psychology/counselling degree. She is not yet a psychotherapist, and has deferred her academic studies in order to pursue a Certificate IV in Mental Health. She currently works as a Peer Support Worker with the National Tobacco and Mental Illness Project. Her website address is www.sonianeale.com.

Related posts:

1. The ICD-10 may provide a better diagnostic criteria for borderline than the DSM-V

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Can Epidemiology Translate Into Understanding Major Depression With Borderline Personality Disorder?

Myrna M. Weissman, Ph.D.
Epidemiologic surveys have mapped the terrain of psychiatric disorders. Personality disorders have bedeviled the clinician’s practice. Rarely have these two been rearranged in a meaningful clinical dialogue. Using the largest psychiatric epidemiologic survey ever, the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions, and among the few to venture into axis II disorders, Skodol et al. (1), in this issue of the Journal, give a community-based national view of a common clinical question: What is the effect of specific personality disorder comorbidity on the course of major depression?

The original sample included over 40,000 adults, and 2,422 met criteria for DSM-IV current major depressive disorder. Three years later, 1,996 of the original currently depressed subjects were available for reinterviewing, which makes both a respectable sample size and response rate for generalizability. However, some caution is needed, since the sample was over-represented with Caucasian, college-educated, and married respondents. Fifteen percent of participants had persistent major depressive disorder, and 7.3% of those who remitted had a recurrence over the follow-up period. These figures are within the range of longitudinal studies of patients with major depressive disorder (2). While the presence of any personality disorder elevated the risk for persistence of major depressive disorder, when all axis I and II disorders, age of onset of major depressive disorder, number of previous episodes, family history, treatment, and duration of illness were controlled, borderline personality disorder remained the most robust predictor of major depressive disorder persistence. Neither personality disorders nor other clinical variables predicted recurrence of major depressive disorder. Thus, an epidemiologic survey yielded a practical jewel. The finding, undoubtedly, does not surprise the clinician but is now confirmed nationally. As the authors conclude, borderline personality disorder should be assessed in all depressed patients and considered in prognosis and addressed in treatment.

One can raise a number of methodologic issues about this study, including the use of lay interviewers or the instrument for assessing axis II disorders. The diagnostic interview, the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, DSM-IV version (3), was developed for this survey. The personality disorders included were adapted from items in the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. The test-retest and internal consistency results reported for all personality disorders are fair to good, not great. However, the agreement with clinician interviews for borderline personality disorder (kappa=0.71) is about as good as it gets (4). The only other national survey to venture into assessing all axis II disorders was the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (5), which used the International Personality Disorder Examination. The investigators carried out a clinical reappraisal in a sample of 214 subjects using clinically trained interviewers to follow up screened, positive subjects and reported excellent predictions of classification. They also noted that the International Personality Disorder Examination is commonly regarded as a conservative diagnostic assessment of axis II disorders. The community rate they generated for any personality disorder in the United States was 11%, and in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys (6), involving 13 countries, the rate was 6.1%. These rates seem to be lower than those reported in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions, but different presentations make it difficult to directly compare rates between studies. No articles from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions reporting overall rates of axis II disorders could be found. Unfortunately, given the findings in the Skodol et al. article, not all personality disorders were included in the first wave of the survey, and borderline personality disorder was added in the second wave. Both of these landmark studies used state-of-the-art measures. While they are imperfect, these are the best available. It is too bad they could not share the same methods.

The major issue now is not a debate about the methods of personality disorder assessment but about the future of personality disorders. The DSM-5 committee is working on the next version of psychiatric classification (7). In parallel, the National Institute of Mental Health is working on moving diagnosis away from clinical presentations to understanding of syndromes based on pathophysiology in a new project called Research Domain Criteria (8). These efforts will certainly effect how personality disorders are described, classified, or reimbursed in the future.

DSM-5 raises issues about the categorical conceptualization of personality disorders because of the high concurrence among disorders, both within and across axes, and the difficulty in differentiating normal from pathological. How dimensions will solve the problem of a lack of understanding of the pathophysiology underlying the disorders is unclear. Some cutoff along the dimension will need to be established for clinical practice.

The Skodol et al. study, based on an epidemiologic survey, may add light to the issue or, at least, generate a hypothesis about diagnosis that can be translated into a more experimental approach. Borderline personality disorder, defined categorically, and not the other axis II disorders explained the persistence of major depressive disorder over 3 years. Other axis I disorders may map out to different axis II disorders. The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions, because of its large sample, could be mined for these clues about the relationship between specific axis I and II disorders.

The Research Domain Criteria project, in the long run, may offer more enlightenment for personality disorders if its goals can be achieved. The primary focus is on neural circuitry, with levels of analysis progressing from measures of circuitry function to clinically relevant variation or downward to the genetic and molecular cellular function (8). In the final analysis, the new molecular and neurobiological parameters will need to predict prognosis or treatment response. They will need to do as well as borderline personality disorder in predicting major depressive disorder persistence. If the Research Domain Criteria approach is successful, more than prediction of prognosis might be achieved, including a deeper understanding of the biological mechanism underlying the joined symptoms.

The epidemiologic finding that borderline personality disorder contributes to poor prognosis of major depressive disorder might be viewed as a hypothesis that can be translated into methods in the neurosciences to understand the mechanism behind this association. The features of borderline personality disorder, particularly the pervasive instability of the regulation of emotions and impulse control, would seem ripe for the Research Domain Criteria approach. When these symptoms occur in conjunction with major depressive disorder, a different syndrome may be present. Further experimental work may test how the symptoms of borderline personality disorder contribute to the prognosis of major depressive disorder. But what about the persistence of borderline personality disorder without major depressive disorder? Can the epidemiologic data provide any clues? In the meantime, the clinician treating major depressive disorder would be wise to assess for borderline personality disorder, even as currently defined.

 

Related posts:

1. Does Britney Spears have Borderline Personality Disorder?
2. Proposed Changes in the DSM-V for Borderline Personality Disorder
3. Major changes in the DSM for personality disorders

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Professor Richard Morriss, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Nottingham, said: ‘In people with depression who score highly on hypomania questionnaires there is a high prevalence of people with impulse control problems such as borderline personality disorder and intermittent explosive disorder who may superficially look like people with bipolar disorder.’

… which in combination with this finding: People with Borderline Personality Disorder over diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder …could have some interesting ramifications for the medical community.

The text of the article:

Bipolar depression unrecognised in primary care
03 Mar 11

By Christian Duffin

Up to a fifth of primary care patients with depression may have an undiagnosed bipolar disorder, a UK study suggests.

The researchers argue that their findings have important implications for GP diagnosis and assessment, because prescribing antidepressants as monotherapy for patients with bipolar disorder may result in mania and frequent mood swings.

The researchers believe that their study is the first to investigate the extent to which bipolar disorder is misdiagnosed as major depressive disorder among UK primary care patients.

The study involved a two-phase sampling technique to produce three estimates of unrecognised bipolar disorder.

The researchers initially collected diagnostic, clinical, psychosocial functioning and quality of life data from 11 GP practices in south Wales for patients with a diagnosis of unipolar depression.

576 of the 3,117 patients contacted sent back completed Hypomania Checklist (HCL-32) and Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS) screening tool questionnaires, both used to test for bipolar disorder.

Of these, 154 were then given a comprehensive diagnostic and clinical assessment. 29 met the diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder.

The researchers calculated three estimates of the prevalence of previously undiagnosed bipolar disorder, ranging from 3.3% up to 21.6%.

The estimates were based on different assumptions. The most conservative estimate assumed that all individuals who dropped out of the study did not have bipolar disorder.

Assuming that all of those who were invited to interview but did not attend did not have bipolar disorder resulted in a prevalence of 9.6%, while assuming all who were invited and attended had bipolar disorder resulted in a prevalence of 21.6%.

Lead researcher Dr Daniel Smith, a clinical senior lecturer in psychiatry at Cardiff University, said: ‘Although challenging, these are findings with potentially considerable implications for they way in which GPs approach the diagnosis and treatment of their patients with depression, especially when we consider how commonly antidepressants are prescribed in primary care and the potential for harm when antidepressants are used as monotherapy for bipolar disorder.’

He added: ‘It will be important that GPs are supported in developing strategies to ensure that their patients with depression receive the correct diagnosis with regard to the possibility of a primary bipolar illness.’

Dr Thomas Shackleton, a GP from Bottisham, near Cambridge with an interest in depression, said the research should serve as a reminder to GPs that they should screen for manic symptoms when they make they make a diagnosis for depression and during the follow-up at 5-12 weeks.

Dr Shackleton, also an advisor to NICE for its guidelines on depression, added: ‘This is a big issue because the majority of first presentations are depressive, and if you prescribe antidepressants you can induce a manic episode in someone who has bipolar disorder.

‘It can be difficult for GPs because if patients have impulsive or risky behaviour, such as risky sex or gambling, they tend you hide it from GPs. But GPs can explore patients’ histories and ask them if their family have had any concerns about them.’

Professor Richard Morriss, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Nottingham, said: ‘In people with depression who score highly on hypomania questionnaires there is a high prevalence of people with impulse control problems such as borderline personality disorder and intermittent explosive disorder who may superficially look like people with bipolar disorder.’

NICE GUIDELINES ON BIPOLAR DISORDER
-
- GPs should fully involve patients in decisions about their treatment and care, and determine treatment plans in collaboration with the patient’s preference.
- GPs should discuss contraception and the risks of pregnancy with all women of child-bearing potential, regardless of whether they are planning a pregnancy.
- People experiencing a manic episode, or severe depressive symptoms, should normally be seen again within a week of their first assessment, and then regularly at appropriate intervals, for example, every 2–4 weeks in the first 3 months and less often after that, if response is good.
- The treatment of bipolar disorder is based primarily on psychotropic medication, but side effects and potential harms will determine the choice of drug. A range of psychological and psychosocial interventions can also have a significant impact.
CG38 Bipolar disorder: NICE guideline, October 2006

Related posts:

1. Four reasons bipolar disorder is accepted and borderline personality disorder is not
2. Must Read Article about BPD and “coming off the couch”
3. An Article on BPD from Earth Times

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Genetics in Borderline Personality Disorder

I was reading an article called “Social cognition in borderline personality disorder: evidence for disturbed recognition of the emotions, thoughts, and intentions of others” and noticed a line in the article that said this: “Thus, in addition to high heritability of BPD (Torgersen et al., 2008), these results argue that environmental factors (e.g., trauma) contribute to disturbed social cognition in BPD. In sum­mary, for the current study we expected PTSD to be a negative predictor of social cognition.” That intrigued me on two levels. One was the “high heritability” part, because often I see comments about BPD and how many people believe that it is mainly caused by childhood trauma (and/or invalidation). In WHINE I state this: As I said earlier, one of the causes of BPD is the “invalidating environment.” Now, it could be that it is not an actual “cause” (and that all the real causes of BPD are biological), but more a reinforcer of BPD. So, the second part of the article that intrigued me was the idea that “we expected PTSD to be a negative predictor of social cognition” – and the discussion and methodology of comorbid PTSD with BPD. What they found was that people with BPD (with or without comorbid PTSD) are less able to understand the intent, thoughts and motivations of social interactions in others – in other words, people with BPD can’t mentalize as well as controls. They also found that this lack of ability is more marked in people with BPD who also have comorbid PTSD. The fact that they mention comorbid PTSD at all is something of a revelation – or perhaps should be to us nons. Many people come to support lists and do research on the Internet and begin their “introduction” of their BPD person with a long list of childhood traumas that explains why the person has BPD. This current research would indicate that PTSD and BPD are clearly two separate disorders and that, while PTSD is a contributor to poorer functioning that BPD alone, BPD is in itself a highly inheritable disorder and biological in nature, yet “reinforced” or made more severe (especially in a social functioning sense) when PTSD is present.

Anyway, this research led me to another scientific study called “Familial Resemblance of Borderline Personality Disorder Features: Genetic or Cultural Transmission?” In which the researchers studied twins, siblings and parents of borderlines to determine the genetic underpinning of BPD or whether the environment and/or cultural influences could have more of an influence on the development of BPD. They found this: “In the present study an extended twin-family design was applied to self-report data of twins (N = 5,017) and their siblings (N = 1,266), parents (N = 3,064) and spouses (N = 939) from 4,015 families, to estimate the effects of additive and non-additive genetic and environmental factors, cultural transmission and non-random mating on individual differences in borderline personality features. Results showed that resemblance among biological relatives could completely be attributed to genetic effects.” and this: “There was no effect of cultural transmission from parents to offspring.”

Recently, in the ATSTP group, we have been discussing the idea that shame/honor-based cultures  and whether that environment could be explanatory in some sense of the development of BPD. It appears (at least based on this 2009 study) that the development and transmission of BPD is NOT cultural. It is essentially genetic (mainly “additive”, meaning it is more than one gene involved) and the environment has an effect, yet cultural transmission was not apparent.

They do go on to say this: “Gene by environment interaction implies that genes determine the degree to which an individual is sensitive to an environment. In the presence of gene-environment interaction, individuals with a ‘sensitive’ genotype will be at greater risk of developing BPD if an undesirable environment is present, than individuals with an ‘insensitive’ genotype.” So, basically, although this interaction has not been fully studied, it appears that some sort of “sensitive” genotype is required to develop BPD.

Related posts:

1. Bellman’s Syndrome – BPD and Chronic Pain
2. Possible Genetic link in BPD?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/03/25/is.it.really.bipolar.disorder

Is it really bipolar disorder?
Published: Thursday, March 25, 2010 – 13:00 in Health & Medicine

A study from Rhode Island Hospital has shown that a widely-used screening tool for bipolar disorder may incorrectly indicate borderline personality disorder rather than bipolar disorder. In the article that appears online ahead of print in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, the researchers question the effectiveness of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). The MDQ is the most widely-used and studied screening tool for bipolar disorder. It is a brief questionnaire that assesses whether a patient displays some of the characteristic behaviors of bipolar disorder. It can be administered by clinicians or taken by patients on their own to determine if they screen positively for bipolar disorder. For the purposes of this study, the MDQ was scored by researchers.

Bipolar and borderline personality disorders share some clinical features, including fluctuations in mood and impulsive actions. The treatments, however, will vary depending on the individual and the diagnosis. Principal investigator Mark Zimmerman, MD, director of outpatient psychiatry at Rhode Island Hospital, conducted a study to test the accuracy of the MDQ.

The research team interviewed nearly 500 patients using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) and the Structured Interview for DSM-IV for personality disorders. The patients were also asked to complete the MDQ. The research team then scored the questionnaires and found that patients with a positive indication for bipolar disorder using the MDQ were as likely to be diagnosed with borderline personality disorder as bipolar disorder when using the structured clinical interview. Further, their findings indicate that borderline personality disorder was four times more frequently diagnosed in the group who screened positive on the MDQ.

Zimmerman says that these findings raise caution for using the MDQ in clinical practice because of how differently the disorders are treated. “An incorrect diagnosis of bipolar disorder will usually lead to a treatment involving medications. If a patient truly has bipolar disorder, that treatment may work. However, at this time there are no approved medications to treat borderline personality disorder.

“Without an accurate diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, we may have many people in treatment who are taking medications that will not work to alleviate the characteristics of the condition from which they really suffer.” Zimmerman, who is also an associate professor of psychiatry and human behavior at The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, continues, “In addition, patients with unrecognized borderline personality disorder will not be treated with one of the effective psychotherapies for this condition. It is therefore vital that we develop or identify a more accurate method to distinguish between these two conditions, and adopt it into clinical practice.”

Related posts:

1. Four reasons bipolar disorder is accepted and borderline personality disorder is not
2. NY Times Article that Mentions BPD
3. BPD more prevelant than previously thought?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

DSM-5 Type and Trait Cross-Walk

Related posts:

1. Role of Shame in BPD
2. It’s time to reject the notion that people with personality disorders are beyond help
3. Proposed Changes in the DSM-V for Borderline Personality Disorder

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

If Bipolar Disorder Is Over-diagnosed, What Are The Actual Diagnoses?

ScienceDaily (July 29, 2009) — A year ago, a study by Rhode Island Hospital and Brown University researchers reported that fewer than half the patients previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder received an actual diagnosis of bipolar disorder after using a comprehensive, psychiatric diagnostic interview tool –the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). In this follow-up study, the researchers have determined the actual diagnoses of those patients.

Their study is published in the July 28 ahead of print online edition of The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.

Under the direction of lead author Mark Zimmerman, MD, director of outpatient psychiatry at Rhode Island Hospital, the researchers’ findings indicate that patients who received a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder that was not confirmed by a SCID, they were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with borderline personality disorder as well as impulse control disorders.

Their research involved the study of 82 psychiatric outpatients who reported that they received a previous diagnosis of bipolar disorder that was not later confirmed through the use of the SCID. The diagnoses in these patients were compared to 528 patients who were not previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The study was conducted between May 2001 and March 2005.

Zimmerman, who is also an associate professor of psychiatry and human behavior at The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, says, “In our study, one quarter of the patients over-diagnosed with bipolar disorder met DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder. Looking at these results another way, nearly 40 percent (20 of 52) of patients diagnosed with DSM-IV borderline personality disorder had been over-diagnosed with bipolar disorder.”

The results of the study also indicate that patients who had been over-diagnosed with bipolar disorder were more frequently diagnosed with major depressive disorder, antisocial personality disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder and eating and impulse disorders.

Zimmerman and colleagues note that “we hypothesize that in patients with mood instability, physicians are inclined to diagnose a potentially medication-responsive disorder such as bipolar disorder rather than a disorder such as borderline personality disorder that is less medication-responsive.”

In their previously published study that concluded bipolar disorder was over-diagnosed, they studied 700 patients. Of the 700 patients, 145 reported they had been previously diagnosed as having bipolar disorder; however, fewer than half of the 145 patients (43.4 percent) were diagnosed with bipolar disorder based on the SCID. The authors state that the over-diagnosis of bipolar disorder can have serious consequences, because while bipolar disorder is treated with mood stabilizers, no medications have been approved for the treatment of borderline personality disorder. As a result, over-diagnosing bipolar disorder can unnecessarily expose patients to serious medication side effects, including possible impact to renal, endocrine, hepatic, immunologic and metabolic functions.

Zimmerman concludes, “Because evidence continues to emerge establishing the efficacy of certain forms of psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder, over-diagnosing bipolar disorder in patients with borderline personality disorder can result in the failure to recommend the most appropriate forms of treatment.”

Along with Zimmerman, other researchers involved in the study include Camile Ruggero, PhD; Iwona Chelminski, PhD and Diane Young, PhD, all of Rhode Island Hospital and Brown University.

---

Related posts:

1. Does Britney Spears have Borderline Personality Disorder?
2. Miami Dolphins Player Brandon Marshall admits to Borderline Personality Disorder
3. A personal post about living with Borderline Personality Disorder

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Related posts:

1. Results from my latest poll
2. New Poll, Please Respond
3. Has Depression become a Catch-All Diagnosis?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Wednesday, Mar. 11, 2009

Redefining Crazy: Researchers Revise the DSM

By John Cloud

If you wanted to make a list of important books you should read, what would you choose? Anna Karenina, maybe? The Bible? How about the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders?

It may not be at the top of your list, but the DSM, as it’s usually called, is one of the most important books in the world. It attempts to categorize, describe and give a code number to literally every problem that can occur in your mind, from schizophrenia to borderline personality disorder to something called mathematics disorder, which is essentially being so bad at math that it amounts to a mental problem.

The DSM is important not only because it is wildly ambitious but also because mental-health professionals around the world have adopted its classification system. In the U.S., it is virtually impossible to get reimbursed by an insurance company for treatment unless a mental-health professional identifies your condition by a DSM code number. (The number for mathematics disorder, if you were wondering, is 315.1. The code for Tourette’s syndrome is 307.23; the code for sexual sadism is 302.84. As I said, the DSM tries to cover everything.) (See the top 10 medical breakthroughs of 2008.)

The American Psychiatric Association (APA), which owns the DSM, is in the process of rewriting the book, which was first published in 1952. The DSM-V, as the fifth edition will be called, is set to be published in 2012. But the process of researching it began way back in 1999 — five years after the publication of the last major revision, the DSM-IV — meaning the new book’s production will take 13 years overall. (Read about how we get labeled by the DSM.)

Why so long? Last week, a research organization called the American Psychopathological Association (which goes by the acronym APPA, to distinguish it from the APA) brought many of the key players in the development of the DSM-V to a conference in New York City to discuss some of the reasons the writing of the book is so complicated.

One obvious reason is that so many people have a stake in what the world defines as crazy and what it calls normal. Famously, homosexuality was listed as a DSM condition until a 1974 vote among APA members removed it. Other groups of mental-health professionals and patients want certain disorders to be added (and covered by insurance): sexual compulsivity, for instance, is not in the DSM, even though “sexual aversion disorder” (302.79) — the persistent and distressing avoidance of genital contact not explained by another disorder like depression — is included. (Read an interview with an author who has bipolar disorder.)

Debates about what should and shouldn’t be in the DSM are fascinating and often bitter, and as I have pointed out before, the book makes at least one fundamental error in the way it conceives of mental problems: it ignores causes almost entirely. If you feel sad and tired for a couple of months, have trouble sleeping and making decisions, and gain weight, you can be given a DSM diagnosis of depression (296.31 or 296.32, mild or moderate, recurrent) and prescribed drugs for it — even if the reason for your funk is that you just lost your job. Such physiological responses as insomnia are evolutionarily natural (and sometimes helpful, in a jump-starting sort of way) when you suffer a trauma like losing your job. But according to the DSM, only perfect is considered normal. Another basic problem with the DSM: it tries to reduce the vastly complex experiences of your mind to a single number.

At last week’s conference, there were tantalizing hints that the DSM-V might fix some of these problems. Dr. Steven Hyman, provost of Harvard, a former psychiatry professor at its medical school and a former director of the National Institute of Mental Health, agitated at the meeting for a new DSM framework that would stop trying to divide mental problems into discrete all-or-nothing categories. That method is appropriate for some medical problems — you either have leukemia or you don’t — but depression, for instance, doesn’t work like that. (Read “Why Do the Mentally Ill Die Younger?”)

Rather, Hyman argued that many mental illnesses are problems that lie along a continuum from normal and functioning to disordered and tragic. To the annoyance of some old-fashioned DSM defenders, he made the case that the DSM should regard mental illness as “continuous with normal”: less like leukemia and more like hypertension. You don’t get diagnosed with hypertension until you meet a cutoff point for high blood pressure that takes into account other extenuating factors: your age, for instance, or the conditions under which the blood-pressure reading is taken. Depression should be the same: if you are sad because you just got divorced, the DSM shouldn’t necessarily consider you to have an illness.

Such a diagnostic model wouldn’t be simple, though, which is one reason the DSM is taking 13 years to rewrite. And in the meantime, the book still has to be useful to everyday clinicians seeing patients who need a code number for insurance companies. “It’s like wondering how you repair the airport while the planes are still flying,” Hyman said at the conference.

Hyman noted that medical problems, whether in the mind or in the body or both, are usually caused by some combination of genes, environment, behavior and chance. Despite the comforting modern notion that severe psychological illnesses are simply due to an unfortunate genetic inheritance, it is the exceedingly rare mental condition that is caused only by genes. (Rett syndrome is one example.) Rather, if you take something like generalized anxiety disorder (300.02), there may be a variety of causes that set it off: genes that cause excessive activity in the fear-producing part of the brain called the amygdala, a stressful job that stimulates that activity, engaging in dumb behavior like having an affair that exacerbates your anxiety, then randomly getting into an anxiety-heightening situation like a car accident. The DSM has to try to account for all of that complexity — causes, effects, unintended consequences — and still be definitive.

Hyman said in an interview that one way the DSM currently handles this complexity is to have what he described as a “wastebasket” diagnosis — called “not otherwise specified” (NOS) — that captures just about anything that doesn’t easily fit the categorical model. One major problem with the NOS diagnosis: pretty much anyone can qualify for a diagnosis that, by definition, is not specified. A 2005 American Journal of Psychiatry paper found that nearly half of a group of 859 people who sought psychological help in Rhode Island could be considered to have a DSM personality disorder if diagnosticians were allowed to include the NOS option. Another problem: how do you adequately treat patients whose illness is unspecified?

A continuum model like the one Hyman proposes could help solve this problem by recognizing that people aren’t always one thing or another. They’re sometimes just a little depressed or a little anxious. To avoid medicalizing normal stress, the DSM-V would set a cutoff point within the spectrum. Of course, determining the right cutoff point for the DSM’s 350 illnesses would take an enormous research effort, one that has begun for some disorders like depression but probably hasn’t even been thought about for rare problems like sexual sadism.

Other attendees at the APPA conference indicated that the new DSM will almost certainly adopt a continuum model for mental illnesses. But don’t be surprised if the book doesn’t come out as scheduled in 2012. If the three-day conference came to any solid conclusion, it was that toting up all the ways our minds can fail is a lot harder than, say, explaining why your appendix might burst.

Read “Tallying Mental Illness’s Costs.”

Read “I’m O.K. You’re O.K. We’re Not O.K.”

Related posts:

1. NY Times Article that Mentions BPD
2. Interesting Article from Time Magazine on BPD

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

A 2008 study of nearly 35,000 adults in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry found that 5.9%–which would translate into 18 million Americans–had been given a BPD diagnosis. As recently as 2000, the American Psychiatric Association believed that only 2% had BPD. (In contrast, clinicians diagnose bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in about 1% of the population.) BPD has long been regarded as an illness disproportionately affecting women, but the latest research shows no difference in prevalence rates for men and women. Regardless of gender, people in their 20s are at higher risk for BPD than those older or younger.

Because generally, it has been acknowledged that BPD occurs in about 2% of the population (which is already equal to the level of bipolar and schizophrenia combined, yet the condition gets much less attention or funding); however, this article states that research has shown that BPD is more than twice as prevalent than previously thought (at 5.9%, which would be almost three times as much as bipolar and schizophrenia combined). Also, the article states that, against the previously published data, there is no difference in prevalence rates between men and women. Typically, the research has shown that BPD patients are 75% female. So, I decided to track down this study and did so. Here is an abstract of the study:

Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV borderline personality disorder: results from the Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Grant BF, Chou SP, Goldstein RB, Huang B, Stinson FS, Saha TD, Smith SM, Dawson DA, Pulay AJ, Pickering RP, Ruan WJ.

Laboratory of Epidemiology and Biometry, Division of Intramural Clinical and Biological Research, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, USA. bgrant@willco.niaaa.nih.gov

OBJECTIVES: To present nationally representative findings on prevalence, sociodemographic correlates, disability, and comorbidity of borderline personality disorder (BPD) among men and women. METHOD: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 34,653 adults participating in the 2004-2005 Wave 2 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Personality disorder diagnoses were made using the Wave 2 Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-DSM-IV Version. RESULTS: Prevalence of lifetime BPD was 5.9% (99% CI = 5.4 to 6.4). There were no differences in the rates of BPD among men (5.6%, 99% CI = 5.0 to 6.2) and women (6.2%, 99% CI = 5.6 to 6.9). BPD was more prevalent among Native American men, younger and separated/divorced/widowed adults, and those with lower incomes and education and was less prevalent among Hispanic men and women and Asian women. BPD was associated with substantial mental and physical disability, especially among women. High co-occurrence rates of mood and anxiety disorders with BPD were similar. With additional comorbidity controlled for, associations with bipolar disorder and schizotypal and narcissistic personality disorders remained strong and significant (odds ratios > or = 4.3). Associations of BPD with other specific disorders were no longer significant or were considerably weakened. CONCLUSIONS: BPD is much more prevalent in the general population than previously recognized, is equally prevalent among men and women, and is associated with considerable mental and physical disability, especially among women. Unique and common factors may differentially contribute to disorder-specific comorbidity with BPD, and some of these associations appear to be sex-specific. There is a need for future epidemiologic, clinical, and genetically informed studies to identify unique and common factors that underlie disorder-specific comorbidity with BPD. Important sex differences observed in rates of BPD and associations with BPD can inform more focused, hypothesis-driven investigations of these factors.

I suppose that the idea that BPD “is associated with considerable mental and physical disability, especially among women” points to the fact that more women seek treatment for the disorder because of the “disability” aspect of its presentation among women. Perhaps that can explain the previously acknowledged statistics of 75% occurrence in women.

Related posts:

1. Study Shows Greater Prevaleance of BPD than Previously Expected

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Thursday, Jan. 08, 2009

Minds on The Edge

By John Cloud/Seattle

Doctors used to have poetic names for diseases. A physician would speak of consumption because the illness seemed to eat you from within. Now we just use the name of the bacterium that causes the illness: tuberculosis. Psychology, though, remains a profession practiced partly as science and partly as linguistic art.

Because our knowledge of the mind’s afflictions remains so limited, psychologists–even when writing in academic publications–still deploy metaphors to understand difficult disorders. And possibly the most difficult of all to fathom–and thus one of the most creatively named–is the mysterious-sounding borderline personality disorder (BPD). University of Washington psychologist Marsha Linehan, one of the world’s leading experts on BPD, describes it this way: “Borderline individuals are the psychological equivalent of third-degree-burn patients. They simply have, so to speak, no emotional skin. Even the slightest touch or movement can create immense suffering.”

Borderlines are the patients psychologists fear most. As many as 75% hurt themselves, and approximately 10% commit suicide–an extraordinarily high suicide rate (by comparison, the suicide rate for mood disorders is about 6%). Borderline patients seem to have no internal governor; they are capable of deep love and profound rage almost simultaneously. They are powerfully connected to the people close to them and terrified by the possibility of losing them–yet attack those people so unexpectedly that they often ensure the very abandonment they fear. When they want to hold, they claw instead. Many therapists have no clue how to treat borderlines. And yet diagnosis of the condition appears to be on the rise.

A 2008 study of nearly 35,000 adults in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry found that 5.9%–which would translate into 18 million Americans–had been given a BPD diagnosis. As recently as 2000, the American Psychiatric Association believed that only 2% had BPD. (In contrast, clinicians diagnose bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in about 1% of the population.) BPD has long been regarded as an illness disproportionately affecting women, but the latest research shows no difference in prevalence rates for men and women. Regardless of gender, people in their 20s are at higher risk for BPD than those older or younger.

What defines borderline personality disorder–and makes it so explosive–is the sufferers’ inability to calibrate their feelings and behavior. When faced with an event that makes them depressed or angry, they often become inconsolable or enraged. Such problems may be exacerbated by impulsive behaviors: overeating or substance abuse; suicide attempts; intentional self-injury. (The methods of self-harm that borderlines choose can be gruesomely creative. One psychologist told me of a woman who used fingernail clippers to pull off slivers of her skin.”

No one knows exactly what causes BPD, but the familiar nature-nurture combination of genetic and environmental misfortune is the likely culprit. Linehan has found that some borderline individuals come from homes where they were abused, some from stifling families in which children were told to go to their room if they had to cry, and some from normal families that buckled under the stress of an economic or health-care crisis and failed to provide kids with adequate validation and emotional coaching. “The child does not learn how to understand, label, regulate or tolerate emotional responses, and instead learns to oscillate between emotional inhibition and extreme emotional lability,” Linehan and her colleagues write in a paper to be published in a leading journal, Psychological Bulletin.

Those with borderline disorder usually appear as criminals in the media. In the past decade, hundreds of stories in major newspapers have recounted violent crimes committed by those said to have the disorder. A typical example from last year was the lurid tale of an Ontario man labeled borderline who used a screwdriver to gouge out his wife’s right eye. (She lived; he got 14 years.”

There are several theories about why the number of borderline diagnoses may be rising. A parsimonious explanation is that because of advances in treating common mood problems like short-term depression, more health-care resources are available to identify difficult disorders like BPD. Another explanation is hopeful: BPD treatment has improved dramatically in the past few years. Until recently, a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder was seen as a “death sentence,” as Dr. Kenneth Silk of the University of Michigan wrote in the April 2008 issue of the American Journal of Psychiatry. Clinicians often avoided naming the illness and instead told patients they had a less stigmatizing disorder.

Therapeutic advances have changed the landscape. Since 1991, as Dr. Joel Paris points out in his 2008 book, Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder, researchers have conducted at least 17 randomized trials of various psychotherapies for borderline illness, and most have shown encouraging results. According to a big Harvard project called the McLean Study of Adult Development, 88% of those who received a diagnosis of BPD no longer meet the criteria for the disorder a decade after starting treatment. Most show some improvement within a year.

Still, the rise in borderline diagnoses may illustrate something about our particular historical moment. Culturally speaking, every age has its signature crack-up illness. In the 1950s, an era of postwar trauma, nuclear fear and the self-medicating three-martini lunch, it was anxiety. (In 1956, 1 in 50 Americans was regularly taking mood-numbing tranquilizers like Miltown–a chemical blunderbuss compared with today’s sleep aids and antianxiety meds.) During the ’60s and ’70s, an age of suspicion and Watergate, schizophrenics of the One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest sort captured the imagination–mental patients as paranoid heroes. Many mental institutions were emptied at the end of this period. In the ’90s, after serotonin-manipulating drugs were released and so many patients were listening to Prozac, thousands of news stories suggested, incorrectly, that the problem of chronic depression had been finally solved. Whether driven by scary headlines, popular movies or just pharmacological faddishness, the decade and the disorder do tend to find each other.

So, is borderline the illness of our age? When so many of us are clawing to keep homes and paychecks, might we have become more sensitized to other kinds of desperation? In a world so uncertain, maybe it’s natural to lose one’s emotional skin. It’s too soon to tell if that’s the case, but BPD does have at least one thing in common with the recession. As Dr. Allen Frances, a former chair of the Duke psychiatry department, has written, “Everyone talks about [BPD], but it usually seems that no one knows quite what to do about it.”

Inside the Mind

To have coffee with Lily (a pseudonym), you wouldn’t get much sense of how she has suffered. She is 40 but could pass for 30. She has blue eyes and long blond hair that falls across her shoulders in slightly curly tendrils. On the December day we met at a diner outside Seattle, she wore a pink wool cap pulled down tight and an Adidas jumper zipped all the way. She was friendly but not terribly expressive, and she carried an aura of self-protection.

At one point in the late ’90s, Lily was taking five drugs that doctors had prescribed: three antidepressants, an antianxiety medication and a sleeping pill. Borderline patients are often overmedicated–partly because therapists see them as difficult–but for Lily, as for most borderlines, the meds did little. “Drug treatment for BPD is much less impressive than most people think,” Paris writes in Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder.

As a teenager, Lily felt little self-confidence. “Junior high and high school just sucks, right?” she said, laughing. “But I had a propensity to take it a little more seriously.” With the help of therapy, she made it through high school and college, but in her late 20s, she became dissatisfied with her job selling specialty equipment. One October day, as she headed out for a mountain-biking trip, she looked at the dun sky and had the feeling that something was wrong. Bleakness massed around her quickly, much faster than it had when she was younger. Soon, nothing gave Lily much joy.

She recalled a talk show in which girls had discussed cutting themselves as a release, a way to relieve depression. “I was so numb,” she said. “I just wanted to feel something–anything.” So she took a knife from the kitchen and cut deeply into her left arm.

If Lily had a hard time figuring out what was behind such dark emotions, she was in good company. When a psychoanalyst named Adolph Stern coined the term borderline in the 1930s, borderline patients were said to be those between Freud’s two big clusters: psychosis and neurosis. Borderlines, Stern wrote rather poetically, exhibit “psychic bleeding–paralysis in the face of crises.” Later, in the 1940s, Dr. Helene Deutsch said borderlines experience “inner emptiness, which the patient seeks to remedy by attaching himself or herself to one after another social or religious group.” By 1968, when Basic Books published the groundbreaking monograph The Borderline Syndrome, the No. 1 characteristic of borderline patients was said to be, simply, anger.

Eventually, borderlines became pretty much anything a therapist said they were. Says Dr. Kenneth Duckworth, medical director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness: “If you hated the patient–if the patient was pissing you off–you would bandy this term about: ‘Oh, you’re just a borderline.’ It was a diagnosis that was a wastebasket of hostility.”

It was Linehan who changed all that. In the early 1990s, she became the first researcher to conduct a randomized study on the treatment of borderline personality disorder. The trial–which showed that a treatment she created called “dialectical behavior therapy” significantly reduced borderlines’ tendency to hurt themselves as well as the number of days they spent as inpatients–astonished a field that had come to see borderlines as hopeless.

Dialectical behavior therapy is so named because at its heart lies the requirement that both patients and therapists find synthesis in various contradictions, or dialectics. For instance, therapists must accept patients just as they are (angry, confrontational, hurting) within the context of trying to teach them how to change. Patients must end the borderline propensity for black-and-white thinking, while realizing that some behaviors are right and some are simply wrong. “The patient’s first dilemma,” Linehan wrote in her 558-page masterwork, 1993′s Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder, “has to do with whom to blame for her predicament. Is she evil, the cause of her own troubles? Or, are other people in the environment or fate to blame? … Is the patient really vulnerable and unable to control her own behavior …? Or is she bad, able to control her reactions but unwilling to do so …? What the borderline individual seems unable to do is to hold both of these contradictory positions in mind.”

Linehan’s achievement was to realize that borderlines are, in fact, on the border between various dualities–dualities that they have to learn to accept and reconcile in order to change their lives. That’s easy to say but seems impossible to do–until you see it work.

A Life Redeemed

After she cut herself, Lily was horrified. In a panic, she called her father, who took her to the hospital. When she was released, she and her parents redoubled their efforts to find her good psychiatric treatment. Through a friend at the University of Washington, they heard about Linehan and contacted her Behavioral Research & Therapy Clinics, which are housed in a homey little annex on the UW campus, where you might find little foil-wrapped chocolates next to the coffee and tea.

Linehan, who grew up in Tulsa, Okla., and spent several years as a nun before becoming a psychologist, embodies several dialectical contradictions: a nun who has never lived in a convent; a careful scientist whose most engaging feature is her wry irreverence; a 65-year-old who has a maternal steeliness but was never a mother. It doesn’t pay to underestimate Marsha Linehan. In Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder, she writes, “If the patient says, ‘I am going to kill myself,’ the therapist might reply, ‘I thought you agreed not to drop out of therapy.’”

In one intense session a few years ago, a patient told Linehan that her work stress was going to lead her to suicide. The patient said Linehan could never understand this stress because she was a successful psychologist. Suicidal borderline patients often confront and alienate therapists in this fashion; for many years, this kind of confrontation was seen as a defining characteristic of the disorder. Linehan believes that borderlines are hurting, not manipulating, but that doesn’t mean she indulges them. In this particular confrontation, Linehan responded, “I do understand. I live with a similar amount of stress … You can just imagine how stressful it is for me to have a patient constantly threatening to kill herself. Both of us have to worry about being fired!”

Such in-your-face tactics were highly controversial when Linehan started out. Other mental-health professionals accused her in public meetings of being heartless, even unethical. But her therapy has saved so many lives and worked so well in randomized trials that few criticize her today. For Lily, who calls Linehan’s therapy “Zen philosophy meets tough love,” Linehan was the first therapist to understand that managing Lily’s illness would require Lily to take a new kind of responsibility–a willingness to grow the emotional skin she never had.

In the beginning, Lily resisted Linehan’s assistance. She felt no one could truly understand the depths of her pain. But Linehan was the first therapist who responded to Lily with more than just endless psychoanalysis and pills. Instead, Linehan taught her practical methods of getting by day-to-day. Once, just after she started with Linehan, Lily locked herself in her parents’ bathroom and swallowed six or seven antidepressants in a half-hearted suicide attempt. Her father broke the door down; her mother called the police. Lily never lost consciousness, but the cops said she had to go to the hospital anyway. Linehan advised Lily’s parents not to accompany her. She also told them they needed to get Lily to work the next day. Lily learned that she wouldn’t be cosseted.

Linehan also taught Lily various skills to regulate her emotions. Among the most important is one Linehan calls the “wise mind”–a kind of calm, Zen state that Linehan insists even the most debilitated patients can achieve. “Generally,” she writes, “I have patients follow their breath … and try to let their focus settle into their physical center, at the bottom of their inhalation. That very centered point is wise mind.” Lily remembers this sensation clearly; she came to feel that her dark moods had a physical location in her body–her solar plexus–and when she focused on it, she could deactivate a destructive emotion.

Another skill Linehan taught Lily (and many others, via a popular DVD called Opposite Action) was an anti-anger technique for social situations: “Don’t make the situation worse,” Linehan counsels on the DVD. “And if possible, be a little tiny bit on the kind side. O.K.?”

If some of this sounds like advice you heard in kindergarten, it should. Remember that borderlines have never learned to regulate their emotions. It’s important to note that Linehan doesn’t just practice tough love with her patients; she also tells them she knows they are hurting and doing the best they can. She emphasizes that she believes in them even though many therapists have tossed them aside. “Clients cannot fail,” she says. “But both treatment and a therapist can fail.” Both compassion and irreverence, both validation and tough love–these are the dialectics at the heart of Linehan’s approach.

One criticism of Linehan’s Zen-derived method is that for some patients, it seems too foreign, too removed from Western experience. Linehan knows her therapy works for most people, but that doesn’t mean she’s unwilling to list its faults. “It takes too long. There are too many components. It takes too much training for therapists,” she says.

Such shortcomings have not dissuaded other therapists from learning Linehan’s techniques. Some 10,000 of them have been trained in dialectical behavior therapy, and Linehan, to her dismay, has become something of a cult figure. “Cults in psychology hurt patients,” she says. “People should try whatever works, not my therapy because it has my name on it.”

Lily, for one, is glad that it’s the therapy she did try. One of her favorite films used to be James Mangold’s 1999 adaptation of Girl, Interrupted, in which Winona Ryder plays a real-life borderline author. When Ryder’s character learns she has received a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, she indignantly asks, “Borderline between what and what?” It’s a question that weighed on Lily for years and one that many of us may start asking if borderline diagnoses continue to increase. But today Lily is able to laugh about the film because she knows, finally, that the answer doesn’t really matter. The key is not defining that uncertain borderline but learning to be happy there.

Related posts:

1. Time to Give Angelina Jolie a more detailed possible BPD analysis
2. Article about bipolar depression that mentions BPD
3. Holy Moly! An article about the girl who doused her face in acid that actually gets it!

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

It is my understanding, and I am a psychologist, that Angelina Jolie checked into (volunatarily not a forced commitment) to the Neuropsychiatric Institute in the late 1990′s due to self-reported suicidal and homicidal ideation, no intention or plan for carrying out was reported. She was diagnosed with presumptive Borderline Personality Disorder which in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness (DSM-IV) for is an Axis II Personality Disorder. Axis I diagnoses are mostly mood disorders and can be transient (i.e. major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, etc). Axis II disorders are thought to be characterological disorders, more ingrained and ego-syntonic and therefore, more difficult to “change.” Since that time, I believe AJ has managed this much better and less self-destructively. There are a few people with BPD who do get better and stop doing crazy and self-destructive things. I think that motherhood was a big adaptive “glue” for her and she has pulled herself together since adopting Maddox. She seems to have found a “bigger purpose” and is not acting out with drugs, etc. Of course many of these patients are vulnerable to stress and loss. Grief or any loss tends to run a more complicated course with persons who have Borderline Personality Disorder. I have never met, evaluated, or treated Jolie, but one of my expertises is BPD. I go to tons of conferences on this and several presenters as well as I recall that she said in a legitimate news source that she was hospitalized by her choice at a particularly chaotic time in her life. That was almost ten yeas ago and I think with age and motherhood along with finding a purpose she found new and more adaptive ways to deal with old demons (and we all have those). That is probably all I will say as a professional because I am on this forum just to goof off but did what to add this given the previous posts.

When Hope is Not Enough
Get the Non-BPD book that is designed for
staying and working on the relationship

Related posts:

1. Does Britney Spears have Borderline Personality Disorder?
2. Understanding Major Depression With Borderline Personality Disorder?
3. Charlie Sheen and Borderline Personality Disorder

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

October 21, 2008

Mind

When All Else Fails, Blaming the Patient Often Comes Next

By RICHARD A. FRIEDMAN, M.D

Doctors and psychotherapists generally don’t like it when their patients don’t get better. But the fact is that lots of patients elude our clinical skill and therapeutic cleverness. That’s often when the trouble starts.

I met one such patient not long ago, a man in his early 30s, who had suffered from depression since his teenage years. In six years of psychotherapy, he had been given nearly every antidepressant under the sun, but his mood hadn’t budged.

Weeping in my office one day, he explained that he was depressed because he was a failure and a whiner. “Even my therapist agreed with me,” he said. “She said that maybe I don’t want to get better.”

I could well imagine his therapist’s frustration. She had been working with him for nearly three years without significant progress, and she was now doing what many clinicians do when the chips are down: blame the patient for failing to improve.

“I think he has an unconscious desire to remain sick,” she told me.

About a month later, I saw this patient respond remarkably well to a novel treatment. Free of depression at last, he was joyful and relieved — an odd reaction, you must admit, from someone who secretly wished to be ill.

Not just that, but he no longer felt like a failure and was much more upbeat about his future prospects.

I decided to challenge him. “How come you’re feeling so much better despite the fact that nothing in your life has really changed in the past few weeks?”

“Well, I guess I just think like that when I’m down.”

Exactly. His sense of worthlessness was a result of his depression, not a cause of it. It’s easy to understand why the patient couldn’t see this: depression itself distorts thinking and lowers self-esteem. But why did his therapist collude with the patient’s depressive symptoms and tell him, in effect, that he didn’t want to get better?

For an all too human reason, I think. Chronically ill, treatment-resistant patients can challenge the confidence of therapists themselves, who may be reluctant to question their treatment; it’s easier — and less painful — to view the patient as intentionally or unconsciously resistant.

I recall an elderly woman who was referred by a colleague for intractable depression, in which I have a special interest. I was eager to help her.several months and many treatments later, I began to get frustrated that she was no better and noticed that my thinking about her shifted. I wondered whether there was something about the sick role that she found rewarding.

After all, she had constant visits from friends and family members, not to mention an army of medical experts who were all trying, in vain, to cure her. If she got better, she might lose all that care and attention.

Then one morning, shortly after starting a new combination of antidepressants, she called. I did not recognize the cheerful voice. “I’m feeling really good,” she told me. “Not depressed at all.”

My delight aside, I felt chagrined that I had begun to write her off as a help-rejecting crank.

Of course, it makes good medical sense for therapists to rethink the diagnosis and treatment of any patient who fails to improve. But this is a double-edged sword.

Another patient, a young woman with unstable moods, was recently hospitalized with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. When she failed to respond to two mood stabilizers, the staff began to entertain a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, which involves emotionally chaotic relationships and impaired ability to function in the world.

“She’s pretty aggressive and demeaning, and we think she has some serious character pathology,” one of the residents told me.

But partly treated bipolar disorder can mimic borderline personality disorder, and after she received a third mood stabilizer, her “personality disorder” melted away, along with her provocative behavior.

This patient had frustrated her clinicians with her lack of response to treatment. In turn, her doctors reacted by changing her diagnosis to a personality disorder. The change in thinking shifted the blame from the clinicians to the patient herself, who was now viewed more as bad than sick.

To be sure, some patients really do want to be sick. People with Munchausen syndrome, for example, deliberately produce physical or psychological symptoms for the express purpose of assuming the sick role. And they will go to extraordinary means to defeat doctors who try to “treat” them.

But a vast majority of patients want to feel better, and for them the burden of illness is painful enough. Let’s keep the blame on the disease, not the patient.

Richard A. Friedman is a professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College.

Related posts:

1. Interesting Article from Time Magazine on BPD
2. Article in Time about the DSM
3. A new article about BPD in NY Times and the reaction

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Experts Argue That Borderline Personality Disorder Should Be Shifted to Axis I

Thursday October 16, 2008

In a recent paper published in Biological Psychiatry, Dr. Antonia New and her colleagues at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine and Bronx VA Medical Center argue the case for shifting borderline personality disorder (BPD) from Axis I to Axis II of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).In the most current, fourth edition of the DSM, BPD is diagnosed on Axis II, which is reserved for “longstanding disorders,” such as personality disorders. In their paper, Dr. New and her colleagues argue that research has not supported the distinction between BPD and Axis I disorders, and that moving BPD to Axis I will spur new research on this serious condition.

Related posts:

1. Oppositional Defiant Disorder
2. Major changes in the DSM for personality disorders
3. Understanding Major Depression With Borderline Personality Disorder?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

If we look at the diagnostic criteria of BPD, I’d say some of those features are REQUIRED to have the disorder (again this is my opinion). From the DSM IV:

A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following – and the diagnosis only applies to 5 or more of ANY of these traits….

1. frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment. Note: Do not include suicidal or self-mutilating behavior covered in Criterion 5.

OK, almost EVERY borderline I have come into contact with or have learned about has this feature including my wife. I didn’t think this was a big deal in my wife until she went into a crisis with one of her close friends and she told me (about the friend) “Don’t touch abandonment! That’s my ISSUE!” Abandonment by her father has had DEEP wounds for her. However, while it is very common, I don’t think it is required.

2. a pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation.

I think this is a requirement, but not a “distinguishing characteristic” of BPD. Nons would not have a problem if this wasn’t an issue. It’s about splitting – however, splitting is not a feature that is exclusive to BPD. You see it in other disorders (although it might not be a diagnostic feature of others). You see it in PTSD, you see it in emotional immaturity… it is a very common cognitive distortion.

3. identity disturbance: markedly and persistently unstable self-image or sense of self.

I don’t know if this is required. I think this could be replaced with pervasive SHAME (which IS required IMO). The sense of self is more than “unstable” – it seems a bit self-judgmental… the invalidating of one’s emotions leads to shame, because it is wrong to feel like one feels. I think that causes an “unstable sense of self” because people have (or you yourself have) invalidated your very essence. It is not OK to be the way you are, so you have to search for a different way to be – in vain. That’s where acceptance can help.

4. impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (e.g., spending, sex, substance abuse, reckless driving, binge eating). Note: Do not include suicidal or self-mutilating behavior covered in Criterion 5.

Personally, I think the impulsiveness is a requirement too. Maybe not the behaviors mentioned here… but BPs are in my experience incredibly impulsive. If you look at this from wikipedia you will see how other countries view BPD:

Comparable diagnoses

The World Health Organization’s ICD-10 has a comparable diagnosis called *Emotionally unstable* personality disorder – Borderline type (F60.31). This requires the following, in addition to the general criteria for personality disorder: disturbances in and uncertainty about self-image, aims, and internal preferences (including sexual); liability to become involved in intense and unstable relationships, often leading to emotional crisis; excessive efforts to avoid abandonment; recurrent threats or acts of self-harm; and chronic feelings of emptiness.

The Chinese Society of Psychiatry’s CCMD has a comparable diagnosis of *Impulsive Personality Disorder (IPD)*. A patient diagnosed as having IPD must display “affective outbursts” and “marked impulsive behavior”, plus at least three out of eight other symptoms. The construct has been described as a hybrid of the impulsive and borderline subtypes of the ICD-10′s Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, and also incorporates six of the nine DSM BPD criteria.

5. recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, or threats, or self- mutilating behavior

Self-mutilating… probably not. Although I have known of many, many BPs that do cut, burn or pull at their hair. Or starve themselves. I think suicidal ideation is a given. According to some sources 75% of BPs attempt suicide at sometime in their lives.

6. affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood (e.g., intense episodic dysphoria, irritability, or anxiety usually lasting a few hours and only rarely more than a few days).

THIS is IMO the CORE feature of ERD (and possibly BPD if it is the same diagnosis – see WHO above). This – in combination with impulsiveness – seems to the the very foundation for BPD/ERD. I don’t think someone can have the disorder that I describe in my book (which I call BPD – or at least my experience with it) without this. This is the main thing the skills in my book try and address, because IMO this is the engine of all other feelings and behaviors. If this can be healed/managed most other things will fall away. Again I am NOT a doctor.

7. chronic feelings of emptiness

Probably important, but not required. I think many BPs DO feel this. It is difficult for me to see this from the outside (or for any non, unless the BP reveals it).

8. inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger (e.g., frequent displays of temper, constant anger, recurrent physical fights)

Again, this is probably required and is what gets most nons to seek help. I think this is an out-growth of emotional dysregulation and shame. They FEEL angry, because angry is a powerful emotion and a natural reaction to threat – even if the threat is “imagined” (although felt).

9. transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms

Well, this is a hard one. I have seen this in my wife a couple of times. She walked around talking to pillows as if they were people at one point. It’s tough to say if this is “required.”

So, I have a certain view of the disorder that I think works in most cases (but possibly not all). I would encourage you guys to read the book and try it out. It takes some time to figure out what I’m saying though… because of the above view of BPs/nons is slightly “unstandard”. Again I’m not a doctor.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

What irked me so about the “Mrs. Treasures” article about Demonic Possession and BPD was that it was indicative of a cognitive distortion that people with BPD often exhibit and one that can be transmitted to the Non-BP over time. That cognitive distortion is black-and-white thinking. It is the tendency for someone to think that something or someone is all good or all bad – good or evil. Framing BPD as analogous to demonic possession puts the borderline in the evil category and infers that the BP is a non’s enemy. People with BPD are not evil; they have a serious mental illness with areas of dysregulation, including behavioral dysregulation. Calling them evil is about as judgmental as one can be and being judgmental is counter-productive when it comes to supporting the healing of a loved one with BPD. That sentence brings me to another point. Mrs. Treasures uses the term “loved one” (and lover) several times in her article, but she expresses little love or sympathy for someone with BPD. If this person is your “loved one” aren’t you inclined to exhibit love toward them? The example that she cites in her article is from “Patrick” who is, of course, an ex-husband of a manipulative borderline woman. Since he is an ex-husband, I suppose he no longer considers his ex-wife a loved one.

And that brings me to another point that I have trouble with – especially in the online support community for nons. It is the fact that many people like to cite Hitler as an example of a historical borderline by stating something to the effect of “you know, arguably the most evil person in history was a borderline.” First of all, although some ex post facto psychological researchers have decided Hitler had BPD, others state that his mental disorders most likely arose from NPD or from an addiction to amphetamines. Certainly, considering yourself the savior of your nation, your race and the world would seem narcissistic to me anyway. Even though “narcissistic behavior” is stated in “Stop Walking on Eggshells” (SWOE) as a symptom of BPD, it is not really a primary symptom. It instead arises from black-and-white thinking and as a counter-balance to shame. It is not mentioned as one of the nine features of BPD in the DSM-IV. It is however mentioned as a primary feature of NPD.

When Hope is Not Enough
Get the Non-BPD book that is designed for
staying and working on the relationship

Hitler’s evil arose not from his supposed borderline personality disorder. It arose from his “will to power” and his setting up an enemy (or several: the Jews, the Poles, the Allies, People with Mental Retardation, the Communists, etc.) that deserved death. He viewed these groups less than human and as an evil plague to the German people. Eradication was the only answer in his mind (or in the mind’s of those around him). That will to power is at the root of all big, historical evils in my opinion. You see it in Pol Pot, in Stalin, in Mao and in many others. The key point is that Hitler set up an “us vs. them” situation in which the German people had to fight to the death with their sworn enemies. If you consider a person with BPD evil (demonic) and yourself as good (Godly), you are setting up the same sort of dynamic with this other person. (OK, I’m not calling anyone Hitler here).

Technically, Hitler couldn’t be diagnosed with BPD (at least by American standards) because the diagnosis didn’t exist in the DSM until 1980. The word “borderline” has been around for a lot longer than that, but the actual diagnosis didn’t get codified until 1980. The diagnosis was still used though – as it was used for Susanna Kaysen (author of “Girl, Interrupted”) in the 1960s.

The historical example of BPD I like to reference (instead of Hitler) is Princess Diana. According to one of her chroniclers, Princess Di had BPD. Based on what I’ve read about her behavior (including bulimia, raging and cutting), if anyone was a likely candidate for BPD in history it’s Princess Di. What is extraordinarily sad about Princess Di was that she had to live much of her life in a fishbowl. That had to be extremely stressful for her. She was also capable of compassion for those in difficult situations, although ultimately Princess Di was a tragic figure and, in my opinion, more representational (than Hitler) of what the experience of a borderline is like.

Before you (as a non) decide that your “loved one” with BPD is evil, I suggest taking a step back and considering how tragic and painful the experience of BPD can be. Think of Princess Di, not Hitler.

Related posts:

1. Angelina Jolie Tops the List of Searched On Celeb Borderlines
2. Burnout, Compassion Fatigue and why non-BPDs lack compassion for borderlines
3. Borderlines vs. Psychopaths

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Seeking to clarify some of these issues, my colleagues and I followed up a group of adolescents who had been referred for assessment to an adolescent unit in Sydney, Australia (Rey and others). Follow-up consisted of a lengthy interview during which a variety of diagnostic instruments and questionnaires was administered. These included the Personality Disorders Examination (Loranger). At the time of initial assessment, the average age was 14 years, while at follow-up it was 20 years. Of the 205 subjects who were located, 145 were fully interviewed. About half of these (44 percent) were female. During the ensuing six years, four of the subjects had died. One female, initially diagnosed as having attention-deficit disorder with hyperactivity, died of a heroin overdose following a period of severe disturbance during which she probably met criteria for conduct disorder. Two males suffered from conduct disorder. One committed suicide; the other died of multiple organ failure caused by hepatitis one day after being released from prison. One male had an adjustment disorder with disturbance of conduct. Reports from relatives at the time of follow-up suggest he was well-adjusted. He died in a car accident. There were 114 (56 percent) individuals with a disruptive disorder diagnosis among the 205 subjects located. Although numbers are too small to draw conclusions, these findings suggest that mortality (3.5 percent) among adolescents with these conditions is likely to be high.

Putting the mortality rate aside, we find that 56% were diagnosed with a disruptive disorder as children. The point here is that there was something wrong with them as children, although it was not labeled a “personality disorder.” If up to 10% of people with BPD take their own life, then it would seem to me that identifying the candidates for BPD as children would be paramount. If there is a constellation of childhood illnesses – childhood bipolar, ADHD, ODD, CD, etc. – then these children can be monitored to help them develop emotional skills to handle their labile emotional states. Here is a quote from a personal interview with a Borderline:

At about the age of 13. I kept feeling like something was missing in me, like I was “”defective”". My social skills were bad, and there was a growing feeling of a void inside me. I went to the school counselor, but as I could not yet identify what was wrong, was not really helped. At 14 I started to suffer from suicidal thoughts. It has never gone since. It’s always there, like some undercurrent. My parents are emotionally crippled in many ways and they could not help or understand, they would tell me to stop being so sensitive.

http://www.borderlinepersonalitytoday.com/main/interviewc.htm

Related posts:

1. Ask Bon: Why does my borderline rage at me?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affects, and marked impulsivity beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following: 1. frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment. Note: Do not include suicidal or self-mutilating behavior covered in Criterion 5. 2. a pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation 3. identity disturbance: markedly and persistently unstable self-image or sense of self 4. impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (e.g., spending, sex, substance abuse, reckless driving, binge eating). Note: Do not include suicidal or self-mutilating behavior covered in Criterion 5. 5. recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, or threats, or self-mutilating behavior 6. affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood (e.g., intense episodic dysphoria, irritability, or anxiety usually lasting a few hours and only rarely more than a few days) 7. chronic feelings of emptiness 8. inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger (e.g., frequent displays of temper, constant anger, recurrent physical fights) 9. transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms

To me, this seems sort of weird, because there would be hundreds, if not thousands, of flavors of BPD.http://www.fortunecity.com/campus/psychology/781/bpd-dsm.htm

Related posts:

1. Biology of Borderline Personality Disorder
2. The Myth of the High-Functioning Borderline
3. The DSM-IV and Bon’s view of BPD/ERD – What’s required?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.