<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DBT, MBT and the Behavioral Chain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anythingtostopthepain.com/dbt-mbt-behavioral-chain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anythingtostopthepain.com/dbt-mbt-behavioral-chain/</link>
	<description>Help for partners and parents of people with Borderline Personality Disorder - Non-BPDs by Bon Dobbs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bon Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.anythingtostopthepain.com/dbt-mbt-behavioral-chain/comment-page-1/#comment-2316</link>
		<dc:creator>Bon Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anythingtostopthepain.com/?p=1119#comment-2316</guid>
		<description>John,

As always your points are well-taken. Yes, in both cases I am using skills after the fact. And yes, I do use both techniques in my daily interaction with people. One other thing I noticed about DBT vs. MBT is that DBT is solely focused on the person with BPD, whereas MBT is focused on the interaction of BOTH people. The purpose is to mentalize (and for both to mentalize) and in doing so the intentions, thoughts, feelings and implicit goings-on in each mind are interacting. The example I give with my daughter is a real life one. 

I can see how MBT techniques can come across as defending and/or challenging to the person with BPD. However, if done with compassion, curiosity and authenticity (the mentalizing &quot;stance&quot;), mentalization will more often be seen as an honest interesting in understanding the thinking of another person.

Bon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>As always your points are well-taken. Yes, in both cases I am using skills after the fact. And yes, I do use both techniques in my daily interaction with people. One other thing I noticed about DBT vs. MBT is that DBT is solely focused on the person with BPD, whereas MBT is focused on the interaction of BOTH people. The purpose is to mentalize (and for both to mentalize) and in doing so the intentions, thoughts, feelings and implicit goings-on in each mind are interacting. The example I give with my daughter is a real life one. </p>
<p>I can see how MBT techniques can come across as defending and/or challenging to the person with BPD. However, if done with compassion, curiosity and authenticity (the mentalizing &#8220;stance&#8221;), mentalization will more often be seen as an honest interesting in understanding the thinking of another person.</p>
<p>Bon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.anythingtostopthepain.com/dbt-mbt-behavioral-chain/comment-page-1/#comment-2315</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anythingtostopthepain.com/?p=1119#comment-2315</guid>
		<description>I like that you are working on incorporating MBT into your skill set for effective interactions with BPs, Bon.  In the example with your daughter, I notice that you are still intervening after she has felt the emotion, experienced the action impulse, and engaged in the behavior.  You validate the emotion so I presume your daughter is no longer in the throes of an EDM when you begin a mentalization approach.  If I understand this correctly, then this clarifies something for me: 

Previously, I thought you meant that for mentalization to be effective, you would have had to catch your daughter at the moment of interpretation, interrupt the behavioral chain, and suggest alternative interpretations before she experiences the emotions/feelings stemming from her initial (negative) interpretation.  

Now, however, my understanding is that you CAN do this in certain circumstances, but you do not HAVE to intervene at that precise moment in time: instead, you can intervene at the same moment in time that you had suggested in &quot;When hope is...&quot; (ie after the behavior has appeared and after validating the emotions that preceded the behavior). 

Then, after the validation step, instead of taking the DBT-based approach (pointing out negative consequences for her of her behavior and facilitating consideration of alternative behaviors), you can take the MBT-based approach (clarifying her interpretation and suggesting alternative interpretations--which actually sound much like a common CBT technique, of identifying negative automatic thoughts and consciously examining them).

Incidentally, I suppose you can do both, right?

If the EDM is directed at me from my wife, then I worry a bit that the MBT approach might come across as defending myself--but I think that, if the validation is done well, then this would likely not be a problem.

Thanks for all of your work on converting this into tools for interaction!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that you are working on incorporating MBT into your skill set for effective interactions with BPs, Bon.  In the example with your daughter, I notice that you are still intervening after she has felt the emotion, experienced the action impulse, and engaged in the behavior.  You validate the emotion so I presume your daughter is no longer in the throes of an EDM when you begin a mentalization approach.  If I understand this correctly, then this clarifies something for me: </p>
<p>Previously, I thought you meant that for mentalization to be effective, you would have had to catch your daughter at the moment of interpretation, interrupt the behavioral chain, and suggest alternative interpretations before she experiences the emotions/feelings stemming from her initial (negative) interpretation.  </p>
<p>Now, however, my understanding is that you CAN do this in certain circumstances, but you do not HAVE to intervene at that precise moment in time: instead, you can intervene at the same moment in time that you had suggested in &#8220;When hope is&#8230;&#8221; (ie after the behavior has appeared and after validating the emotions that preceded the behavior). </p>
<p>Then, after the validation step, instead of taking the DBT-based approach (pointing out negative consequences for her of her behavior and facilitating consideration of alternative behaviors), you can take the MBT-based approach (clarifying her interpretation and suggesting alternative interpretations&#8211;which actually sound much like a common CBT technique, of identifying negative automatic thoughts and consciously examining them).</p>
<p>Incidentally, I suppose you can do both, right?</p>
<p>If the EDM is directed at me from my wife, then I worry a bit that the MBT approach might come across as defending myself&#8211;but I think that, if the validation is done well, then this would likely not be a problem.</p>
<p>Thanks for all of your work on converting this into tools for interaction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

